Investigating the effect of government subsidies on enterprise research and development

被引:1
作者
Wu, Guangliang [1 ]
Buravleva, Yana [2 ]
Wu, Jing [3 ]
Li, Yi [4 ]
Tang, Decai [5 ]
Bethel, Brandon J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Marxism, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Med Assoc, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] China Banking & Insurance Regulatory Commiss, Jiangsu Off, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[6] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Marine Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
lithium-ion batteries; governmental subsidies; Hausman test; information flow; OLS regression; BATTERY ENERGY-STORAGE; LITHIUM-ION BATTERY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.964528
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governments design and implement policies to achieve various goals. Still, perhaps none are as pressing as shifting national economies away from non-renewable fuels and towards more sustainable, environmentally-friendly technologies. To incentivize such transitions, governments provide subsidies to private and public companies to innovate, i.e., to engage in research and development (R & D). However, it can be asked if companies are using government subsidies (GS) actually to perform R & D, and the answer will determine the effectiveness of government policies. This paper seeks to answer this question by investigating Chinese lithium-ion battery (LiB) firms and the GS they receive. Hausman tests, fixed- and random-effects models, and Generalized Method of Moments confirmed a positive but weak correlation between GS and R & D as determined by patent output (PO). Interestingly, observations of information flow suggested that GS also affected other variables such as net profit and main business income. This suggests that firms are awarded GS for higher PO, but a corresponding increase in R & D and its expected growth in company performance is not occurring. It is suggested that performance indicators other than PO be used as Chinese firms may use this metric to apply for more GS, rather than performing R & D that leads to technological breakthroughs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Ratner S.V., 2019, INT J ENERGY EC POLI, V10, P286, DOI [10.32479/ijeep.8627, DOI 10.32479/IJEEP.8627]
  • [32] Evolution of European Union's energy security in gas supply during Russia-Ukraine gas crises (2006-2009)
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Laura
    Fernandez Carvajal, Ana Belen
    Manuel Ruiz-Gomez, Luis
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 30
  • [33] Santoleri P., 2020, CAUSAL EFFECTS R D G, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3637867, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3637867]
  • [34] Scott S., 2020, ID068 OFF IND
  • [35] Shen C., 2019, J PHYS C SERIES 1347
  • [36] Simic Z, 2021, INT J ELECTR COMPUT, V12, P53
  • [37] Villain or victim? Framing strategies and legitimation practices in the Russian perspective on the European Union's Third Energy Package
    Stancik, Andrej
    Osicka, Jan
    Overland, Indra
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 74
  • [38] Natural gas and the Russia-Ukraine crisis: Strategic restraint and the emerging Europe-Eurasia gas network
    Stulberg, Adam N.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 24 : 71 - 85
  • [39] Does renewable energy redefine geopolitical risks?
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Khan, Khalid
    Umar, Muhammad
    Zhang, Weike
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 158
  • [40] Tax Incentives, R&D Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
    Sun, Wenyan
    Yin, Kedong
    Liu, Zhe
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)