Investigating the effect of government subsidies on enterprise research and development

被引:1
作者
Wu, Guangliang [1 ]
Buravleva, Yana [2 ]
Wu, Jing [3 ]
Li, Yi [4 ]
Tang, Decai [5 ]
Bethel, Brandon J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Marxism, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Med Assoc, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] China Banking & Insurance Regulatory Commiss, Jiangsu Off, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[6] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Marine Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
lithium-ion batteries; governmental subsidies; Hausman test; information flow; OLS regression; BATTERY ENERGY-STORAGE; LITHIUM-ION BATTERY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.964528
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governments design and implement policies to achieve various goals. Still, perhaps none are as pressing as shifting national economies away from non-renewable fuels and towards more sustainable, environmentally-friendly technologies. To incentivize such transitions, governments provide subsidies to private and public companies to innovate, i.e., to engage in research and development (R & D). However, it can be asked if companies are using government subsidies (GS) actually to perform R & D, and the answer will determine the effectiveness of government policies. This paper seeks to answer this question by investigating Chinese lithium-ion battery (LiB) firms and the GS they receive. Hausman tests, fixed- and random-effects models, and Generalized Method of Moments confirmed a positive but weak correlation between GS and R & D as determined by patent output (PO). Interestingly, observations of information flow suggested that GS also affected other variables such as net profit and main business income. This suggests that firms are awarded GS for higher PO, but a corresponding increase in R & D and its expected growth in company performance is not occurring. It is suggested that performance indicators other than PO be used as Chinese firms may use this metric to apply for more GS, rather than performing R & D that leads to technological breakthroughs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] R&D and patents: is it a two way street?
    Altuzarra, Amaia
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 28 (02) : 180 - 196
  • [2] Mixed-Integer Programming Model for Transmission Network Expansion Planning with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
    Andres Mora, Camilo
    Danilo Montoya, Oscar
    Rivas Trujillo, Edwin
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (17)
  • [3] Incentivizing Innovation: The Causal Role of Government Subsidies on Lithium-Ion Battery Research and Development
    Buravleva, Yana
    Tang, Decai
    Bethel, Brandon J.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [4] Selection of Lithium-ion Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles under China's New Energy Vehicle Credit Regulation
    Chen, Kangda
    Zhao, Fuquan
    Hao, Han
    Liu, Zongwei
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 3038 - 3044
  • [5] Chepeliev M., 2022, Cutting Russias fossil fuel exports: Short-term pain for long-term gain, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4081300, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4081300]
  • [6] Can direct innovation subsidies relax SMEs' financial constraints?
    Chiappini, Raphael
    Montmartin, Benjamin
    Pommet, Sophie
    Demaria, Samira
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2022, 51 (05)
  • [7] Full-scale experimental study on suppressing lithium-ion battery pack fires from electric vehicles
    Cui, Yan
    Liu, Jianghong
    Han, Xin
    Sun, Shaohua
    Cong, Beihua
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2022, 129
  • [8] Das R.C., 2020, J INNOV ENTREP, V9, P18, DOI [10.1186/s13731-020-00130-8, DOI 10.1186/S13731-020-00130-8]
  • [9] Cooperation of EU with Russia in the Field of Energy: A Review
    Fokaides P.A.
    [J]. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2020, 7 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [10] Goncharuk A.G., 2021, POLITYKA ENERG, V24, P105, DOI [10.33223/epj/144769, DOI 10.33223/EPJ/144769]