Do Perceptions of Legitimacy and Fairness Matter in Prison? Examining How Procedural and Distributive Justice Relate to Misconduct

被引:24
作者
Campbell, Christopher M. [1 ]
Labrecque, Ryan M. [2 ]
Schaefer, Roger L. [3 ]
Harvis, Molly [4 ]
Zavita, Karma Rose [4 ]
Reddy, Leah [4 ]
Labranche, Kayla [4 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Criminol Portland, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Criminal Justice, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Cent Washington Univ, Dept Law & Justice, Ellensburg, WA USA
[4] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
legitimacy; corrections; perceptions; prison misconduct; procedural justice; correctional officers; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; INMATE MISCONDUCT; VIOLENCE; EXERCISE; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0093854820916901
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recent scholarship suggests disciplinary protocols and incarcerated individuals' perceptions of procedural justice toward correctional officers may be important in influencing one's behavior and prison order. This study provides an examination of procedural and distributive justice in prison. We surveyed a stratified random sample of 144 respondents incarcerated in Maine state prisons about their perceptions toward the disciplinary process and corrections officers to assess the relationship between such views and patterns of institutional misconduct. Findings provide partial support for the procedural justice perspective in prison. Normative perceptions (e.g., legitimacy) are positively associated with voluntary deference measures while instrumental perceptions of officer effectiveness in controlling behavior are positively associated with respondent perceived risk. These results supply insight into theory development related to voluntary deference. Similarly, these findings can inform which relationships between officers and respondents may hold the potential to promote rule compliance and prison order.
引用
收藏
页码:1630 / 1653
页数:24
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice
[2]   A Social Building? Prison Architecture and Staff-Prisoner Relationships [J].
Beijersbergen, Karin A. ;
Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. ;
van der Laan, Peter H. ;
Nieuwbeerta, Paul .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2016, 62 (07) :843-874
[3]   Procedural Justice, Anger, And Prisoners' Misconduct [J].
Beijersbergen, Karin A. ;
Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. ;
Eichelsheim, Veroni I. ;
Van der Laan, Peter H. ;
Nieuwbeerta, Paul .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 42 (02) :196-218
[4]   Positive Administrative Control: Using Social Exchange to Assess Managerial Impacts on Inmate Misconduct [J].
Benefiel, Rodger C. .
JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (04) :682-717
[5]   Procedural Justice and Prison Violence: Examining Complaints Among Federal Inmates (2000-2007) [J].
Bierie, David M. .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2013, 19 (01) :15-29
[6]  
Bishop N., 2006, J CRIMINOLOGY, V3
[7]  
Bonta J., 2017, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON, V6th
[8]  
Bottoms AnthonyE., 1999, Crime and Justice, V26, P205, DOI DOI 10.1086/449298
[9]   Prisoners' participation and involvement in prison life: Examining the possibilities and boundaries [J].
Brosens, Dorien .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2019, 16 (04) :466-485
[10]   Examining the Use of Disciplinary Segregation within and across Prisons [J].
Butler, H. Daniel ;
Steiner, Benjamin .
JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2017, 34 (02) :248-271