Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery

被引:71
作者
Hashiguchi, Y. [1 ]
Hase, K. [1 ]
Ueno, H. [1 ]
Mochizuki, H. [1 ]
Shinto, E. [1 ]
Yamamoto, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Med Coll, Dept Surg, Tokorozawa, Saitama 3598513, Japan
关键词
LYMPH-NODE EVALUATION; RECTAL-CANCER; CURATIVE RESECTION; DISSECTION; SURVIVAL; HEMICOLECTOMY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.7518
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A standard management policy has not yet been established with respect to the extent of lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer. Methods: A total of 914 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for T2-T4 colonic cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the potential contributions to the staging accuracy of the distinct area were analysed. The survival benefit of dissection was compared for pericolic (local), mesocolic (intermediate) and main arterial trunk (main) LN. Results: Removal of the pericolic LNs within 5 cm of the tumour and intermediate LNs resulted in a mean LN number of 15.9, a sensitivity for overall node positivity of 97.5 per cent, and a survival benefit calculated as a therapeutic value index of 31.4 points. The additional removal of LNs more than 5 cm from the tumour and main LNs did not improve the staging accuracy, while adding only 3.4 points to the survival benefit. Conclusion: Current guidelines may encourage needlessly extensive surgery. Clinical trials to establish the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1178
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, JAP CLASS COL CARC
  • [2] Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: A national hospital report card
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Stewart, Andrew K.
    Talamonti, Mark S.
    Winchester, David P.
    Russell, Thomas R.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (18) : 1310 - 1317
  • [3] Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review
    Chang, George J.
    Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
    Skibber, John M.
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (06) : 433 - 441
  • [4] More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer - A population-based study
    Chen, Steven L.
    Bilchik, Anton J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (04) : 602 - 610
  • [5] Compton CC, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P979
  • [6] ENHANCED SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH COLON AND RECTAL-CANCER IS BASED UPON WIDE ANATOMIC RESECTION
    ENKER, WE
    LAFFER, UT
    BLOCK, GE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1979, 190 (03) : 350 - 360
  • [7] Prognostic Significance of the Number of Lymph Nodes Examined in Colon Cancer Surgery Clinical Application Beyond Simple Measurement
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    Hase, Kazuo
    Ueno, Hideki
    Mochizuki, Hidetaka
    Kajiwara, Yoshiki
    Ichikura, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Junji
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (05) : 872 - 881
  • [8] National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Uterine neoplasmsV.1.2024. 2024
  • [9] Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery
    Nelson, H
    Petrelli, N
    Carlin, A
    Couture, J
    Fleshman, J
    Guillem, J
    Miedema, B
    Ota, D
    Sargent, D
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (08): : 583 - 596
  • [10] CURATIVE RESECTION FOR LEFT COLONIC-CARCINOMA - HEMICOLECTOMY VS SEGMENTAL COLECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE, CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER TRIAL
    ROUFFET, F
    HAY, JM
    VACHER, B
    FINGERHUT, A
    ELHADAD, A
    FLAMANT, Y
    MATHON, C
    GAINANT, A
    BENHAMIDA, F
    BERNARD, JL
    BREIL, P
    CHIPPONI, J
    COUR, JC
    CRAS, C
    DAZZA, F
    DELALANDE, JP
    DESCOTTES, B
    POUGET, X
    DESMAIZIERES, F
    DESVIGNES, G
    FAGNIEZ, PL
    THOMSEN, C
    OBERLIN, P
    POURCHER, J
    LACAINE, F
    HENNET, H
    KASWIN, R
    KELLER, D
    KOHLMANN, G
    LAGADEC, B
    OTTE, C
    POULIQUEN, X
    POULTON, F
    RODARY, M
    TIMMERMANS, M
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) : 651 - 659