This paper attempts to arrange a meeting between Ricaeur and Saussure through their texts. Ricaeur's reading Saussure reflects a particular limitation of his time, i.e., the structuralism to which we are no longer confined. He criticizes Saussure from a semantic point of view by appealing to the notion of discourse. According to Meschonnic, the discovery in 1996 of a manuscript of Saussure regarding the double essence of language reveals a particular interest in this notion, warranting a revisiting of Saussurean thought and thus reopening a debate on the status of meaning. Ricaeur regards the question of meaning as a moment of self-understanding, situated outside the semiotic system in the world of signification. Saussure suggests defining the value of a linguistic unit in relation to its surrounding units. Where the former searches outside the linguistic unit, the latter searches around it: both refuse to remain, as it were, inside it. In this paper, I suggest that they were to be at odds with the question of time when raising the question of meaning. Eager to grasp a meaning that changes from one moment to the next, they relied on notions of system or context to regulate semantic diversity.
机构:
Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Fundamental Studies, Lab Philosoph Studies, Moscow, Russia
Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Sch Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Moscow, RussiaNatl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Ctr Fundamental Studies, Lab Philosoph Studies, Moscow, Russia