Irreversible electroporation after induction chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

被引:22
作者
He, Chaobin [1 ]
Wang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yu [3 ]
Lin, Xiaojun [1 ]
Li, Shengping [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Dept Pancreatobiliary Surg,Canc Ctr, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Dept Ultrason,Canc Ctr, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; Irreversible electroporation; Chemotherapy; Efficacy; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; GEMCITABINE; SAFETY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; FOLFIRINOX; EFFICACY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pan.2020.02.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a devastating disease and irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablation method that is especially suitable for the treatment of LAPC. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival of LAPC patients after induction chemotherapy followed by IRE and chemotherapy alone. Methods: From August 2015 to August 2017, a total of 132 patients with LAPC were identified. The oncological outcomes of these two treatments were analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: Before PSM analysis, patients with LAPC had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemotherapy followed by IRE than those who received chemotherapy alone (2-year OS rates, 57.9% vs 19.8%, P < 0.001; 2-year PFS rates, 31.4% vs 9.3%, P < 0.001). The baseline clinicopathological factors were balanced between the 2 groups through PSM analysis. Even after PSM, the OS and PFS rates of patients after induction chemotherapy followed by IRE treatment were superior to those of patients who received chemotherapy treatment alone (2-year OS rates, 57.9% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001; 2-year PFS rates, 31.4% vs 7.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that chemotherapy plus IRE was a significant prognostic factor for both OS and PFS in patients of both the whole cohort and the matched cohort. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy followed by IRE provided better OS and PFS than chemotherapy alone for patients with LAPC. This combination method may be a more suitable treatment for patients with LAPC. (C) 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 484
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Combined Modality Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement
    Abrams, Ross A.
    Lowy, Andrew M.
    O'Reilly, Eileen M.
    Wolff, Robert A.
    Picozzi, Vincent J.
    Pisters, Peter W. T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 1751 - 1756
  • [2] Stage III pancreatic cancer and the role of irreversible electroporation
    Al Efishat, Mohammad
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, HEPATOBILIARY PANCRE
  • [4] [Anonymous], ONCOL
  • [5] Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 10 (02) : 150 - 161
  • [6] Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: An intention to treat analysis
    Barenboim, Alex
    Lahat, Guy
    Geva, Ravit
    Nachmany, Ido
    Nakache, Richard
    Goykhman, Yaacov
    Brazowski, Eli
    Rosen, Galia
    Isakov, Ofer
    Wolf, Ido
    Klausner, Joseph M.
    Lubezky, Nir
    [J]. EJSO, 2018, 44 (10): : 1619 - 1623
  • [7] Trends in the treatment and outcome of pancreatic cancer in the United States
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    Whitson, Bryan A.
    Tuttle, Todd M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 1320 - 1326
  • [8] Percutaneous CT-guided irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy as a novel neoadjuvant protocol in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Our preliminary experience
    Belfiore, Maria Paola
    Ronza, Francesco Michele
    Romano, Francesco
    Ianniello, Giovanni Pietro
    De Lucia, Guido
    Gallo, Concetta
    Marsicano, Carmela
    Di Gennaro, Teresa Letizia
    Belfiore, Giuseppe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 21 : S34 - S39
  • [9] Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
    Bockhorn, Maximilian
    Uzunoglu, Faik G.
    Adham, Mustapha
    Imrie, Clem
    Milicevic, Miroslav
    Sandberg, Aken A.
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Bassi, Claudio
    Buechler, Markus
    Charnley, Richard M.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Cruz, Laureano Fernandez
    Dervenis, Christos
    Fingerhutt, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hartwig, Werner
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Montorsi, Marco
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vashist, Yogesh K.
    Vollmer, Charles
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Izbicki, Jakob R.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2014, 155 (06) : 977 - 988
  • [10] Irreversible Electroporation of the Pancreas: Definitive Local Therapy Without Systemic Effects
    Bower, Matthew
    Sherwood, Leslie
    Li, Yan
    Martin, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 104 (01) : 22 - 28