Does Environmental Regulation Promote Industrial Green Technology Progress? Empirical Evidence from China with a Heterogeneity Analysis

被引:20
作者
Ji, Yanli [1 ]
Xue, Jie [2 ]
Zhong, Kaiyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Changshu Inst Technol, Sch Math & Stat, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ Informat Engn, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; green technology progress; heterogeneity tools; interaction; threshold effect; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INNOVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; PERSPECTIVE; ENERGY; MARKET; MODEL; COMPETITIVENESS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19010484
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The complex relationship between environmental regulation and green technology progress has always been a hot topic of research, especially in developing countries, where the impact of environmental regulation is important. Current research is mainly concerned with the impact of the single environmental regulation on technological progress and lacks study on the diversity of environmental regulations. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the heterogeneity of the effects of different types of environmental regulation on industrial green technology progress. As China's scale of economy and pollution emissions are both large, and the government has also made great efforts in environmental regulation, this paper takes China as the example for analyses. We first use the EBM-GML method to measure the industrial green technology progress of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2018, and then apply the panel econometric model and threshold model to empirically investigate the influence of 3 types of environmental regulation. The results show that, first, the impacts of environmental regulation on industrial green technology progress are significantly different; specifically, command-based regulation has no direct significant impact, and autonomous regulation has played a positive role, and market-based regulation's quadratic curve effect is significant, in which the cost-based and investment-based tool presents an inverted U-sharped and U-sharped, respectively. Second, there may be a weak alternative interaction among different types of environmental regulation. Third, a market-based regulatory tool has a threshold effect; with the upgrading of environmental regulation compliance, the effect of a cost-based tool is characterized by "promotion inhibition", and that of an investment-based tool is "inhibition promotion". Finally, the results of regional analysis are basically consistent with those of the national analysis. Based on the study, policy enlightenment is put forward to improve regional industrial green technology progress from the perspective of environmental regulation. This paper can provide a useful analytical framework for studying the relationship between environmental regulation and technological progress in a country, especially in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [2] Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing
    Alpay, E
    Buccola, S
    Kerkvliet, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) : 887 - 901
  • [3] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [4] Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness
    Bansal, P
    Roth, K
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) : 717 - 736
  • [5] THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY - DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS
    BARBERA, AJ
    MCCONNELL, VD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (01) : 50 - 65
  • [6] Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin
    Berman, E
    Bui, LTM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) : 265 - 295
  • [7] Bernauer T., 2007, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, V39, P323, DOI DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-A-005389056
  • [8] Voluntary environmental regulation in developing countries: Mexico's Clean Industry Program
    Blackman, Allen
    Lahiri, Bidisha
    Pizer, William
    Rivera Planter, Marisol
    Munoz Pina, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 60 (03) : 182 - 192
  • [9] Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry
    Borghesi, Simone
    Cainelli, Giulio
    Mazzanti, Massimiliano
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) : 669 - 683
  • [10] Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China
    Bu, Maoliang
    Qiao, Zhenzi
    Liu, Beibei
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 : 10 - 18