Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management

被引:75
作者
Tan, Evrim [1 ]
Mahula, Stanislav [1 ]
Crompvoets, Joep [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Publ Governance Inst PGI, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Blockchain; Distributed ledger technology; Governance; Public management; DAO; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
A key challenge behind the adoption of blockchain in the public sector is understanding the dynamics of blockchain governance. Based on a systematic literature review, this article analyzes different approaches to blockchain governance across disciplines and develops a comprehensive conceptual framework for the study of blockchain governance decisions in the public sector. The framework clusters nine types of governance decisions (infrastructure architecture, application architecture, interoperability, decision-making mechanism, incentive mechanism, consensus mechanism, organization of governance, accountability of governance, and control of governance) into three levels of analysis (micro, meso, and macro-levels). Drawing on public management theories and concepts, the article elucidates the implications of various governance choices in each level of governance and provides a primer for researchers and policy practitioners on the design of blockchain-based systems in the public sector.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[31]  
Finck M, 2018, Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe
[32]   Blockchain's future: can the decentralized blockchain community succeed in creating standards? [J].
Flood, John ;
Mccullagh, Adrian .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2020, 35
[33]   Designing a Blockchain Model for the Paris Agreement's Carbon Market Mechanism [J].
Franke, Laura ;
Schletz, Marco ;
Salomo, Soren .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
[34]   Implications of blockchain distributed ledger technology for records management and information governance programs [J].
Franks, Patricia C. .
RECORDS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 30 (03) :287-299
[35]  
GOVERNATORI G, 2018, ARTIF INTELL LAW, V26, P377, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10506-018-9223-3
[36]   The epistemic evolution of market authority: Big data, blockchain and China's neostatist challenge to neoliberalism [J].
Gruin, Julian .
COMPETITION & CHANGE, 2021, 25 (05) :580-604
[37]   Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources [J].
Gusenbauer, Michael ;
Haddaway, Neal R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (02) :181-217
[38]   TOWARD A MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF DECENTRALIZATION IN BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE: COMMENTARY ON "TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN? DECENTRALIZED VERSUS PROPRIETARY BLOCKCHAINS AND THE PERFORMANCE OF DIGITAL CURRENCIES" BY CENNAMO, MARCHESI, AND MEYER [J].
Halaburda, Hanna ;
Mueller-Bloch, Christoph .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES, 2020, 6 (04) :712-714
[39]  
Hassani H., 2018, BIG DATA COGN COMPUT, V2, P34, DOI DOI 10.3390/BDCC2040034
[40]   Democratic Blockchain Design [J].
Hermstruewer, Yoan .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2019, 175 (01) :163-177