The Law on State Responsibility and the World Trade Organization

被引:4
作者
Ventouratou, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Fac Law, Oxford, England
关键词
applicable law; Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts; general international law; inherent powers; interpretation; state responsibility; systemic integration; World Trade Organization; WTO APPELLATE BODY; INTERNATIONAL-LAW; COMPROMISSORY CLAUSES; ICJ;
D O I
10.1163/22119000-12340228
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This paper examines the role of general international law in the World Trade Organization (WTO) regime, using the rules on state responsibility as a case study. It identifies and discusses instances in WTO case law where such rules were applied directly or were taken into consideration in interpreting relevant WTO provisions. The analysis demonstrates that direct application of general international law for the determination of indispensable matters not regulated by the WTO Agreements is part of the inherent powers of WTO adjudicative bodies. Moreover, under Article 3(2) Dispute Settlement Understanding and Article 31(3)(c) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, WTO adjudicative bodies have an obligation to take into account general international law in interpreting relevant WTO provisions. The paper delineates the methodology for assessing the interaction between general international law and WTO law and highlights the importance of adhering to this methodology to provide clarity and legal certainty regarding the scope and content of WTO obligations.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 803
页数:45
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Protection of Non-Trade Values in WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence: Exceptions, Economic Arguments, and Eluding Questions [J].
Andersen, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2015, 18 (02) :383-405
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, LEGAL VISIONS 21 CEN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Security Executive Agent Directive 6: Continuous Evaluation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BYBIL
[5]   Applicable law in WTO dispute settlement proceedings [J].
Bartels, L .
JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2001, 35 (03) :499-519
[6]  
Bartels Lorand., 2004, INT'L COMP. L.Q, V53, P861
[7]  
Broude Tomer, 2011, MULTISOURCED EQUIVAL, P119
[8]   Fragmenting international law through compromissory clauses?: Some remarks on the decision of the ICJ in the Oil Platforms case [J].
Cannizzaro, E ;
Bonafé, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2005, 16 (03) :481-497
[9]   Like it or Not, Unilateral Sanctions Are Here to Stay [J].
Cohen, David S. ;
Goldman, Zachary K. .
AJIL UNBOUND, 2019, 113 :146-151
[10]  
Crawford J, 2013, CAMB STUD INT COMP, V100, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139033060