Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth

被引:213
作者
Cheniclet, C
Rong, WY
Causse, M
Frangne, N
Bolling, L
Carde, JP
Renaudin, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux 1, UMR Physiol & Biotechnol Vegetales 619, INRA, Univ Bordeaux 2, F-33883 Villenave Dornon, France
[2] INRA, Unite Rech Genet & Ameliorat Fruites & Legumes, F-84143 Montfavet, France
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.105.068767
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Postanthesis growth of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) as of many types of fruit relies on cell division and cell expansion, so that some of the largest cells to be found in plants occur in fleshy fruit. Endoreduplication is known to occur in such materials, which suggests its involvement in cell expansion, although no data have demonstrated this hypothesis as yet. We have analyzed pattern formation, cell size, and ploidy in tomato fruit pericarp. A first set of data was collected in one cherry tomato line throughout fruit development. A second set of data was obtained from 20 tomato lines displaying a large weight range in fruit, which were compared as ovaries at anthesis and as fully grown fruit at breaker stage. A remarkable conservation of pericarp pattern, including cell layer number and cell size, is observed in all of the 20 tomato lines at anthesis, whereas large variations of growth occur afterward. A strong, positive correlation, combining development and genetic diversity, is demonstrated between mean cell size and ploidy, which holds for mean cell diameters from 10 to 350 mm (i.e. a 32,000-times volume variation) and for mean ploidy levels from 3 to 80 C. Fruit weight appears also significantly correlated with cell size and ploidy. These data provide a framework of pericarp patterning and growth. They strongly suggest the quantitative importance of polyploidy-associated cell expansion as a determinant of fruit weight in tomato.
引用
收藏
页码:1984 / 1994
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size
    Barow, M
    Meister, A
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 26 (04) : 571 - 584
  • [2] Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity
    Beemster, GTS
    De Vusser, K
    De Tavernier, E
    De Bock, K
    Inzé, D
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 129 (02) : 854 - 864
  • [3] High amounts of nuclear DNA in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) pericarp
    Bergervoet, JHW
    Verhoeven, HA
    Gilissen, LJW
    Bino, RJ
    [J]. PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 116 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [4] Do genetic make-up and growth manipulation affect tomato fruit size by cell number, or cell size and DNA endoreduplication?
    Bertin, N
    Borel, C
    Brunel, B
    Cheniclet, C
    Causse, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 92 (03) : 415 - 424
  • [5] CELL NUMBER, CELL-SIZE AND HORMONE LEVELS IN SEMI-ISOGENIC MUTANTS OF LYCOPERSICON-PIMPINELLIFOLIUM DIFFERING IN FRUIT SIZE
    BOHNER, J
    BANGERTH, F
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1988, 72 (02) : 316 - 320
  • [6] BUVAT R, 1965, ENCYCLOPEDIA PLANT P, V15, P100
  • [7] QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato:: a few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits
    Causse, M
    Saliba-Colombani, V
    Lecomte, L
    Duffé, P
    Rousselle, P
    Buret, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2002, 53 (377) : 2089 - 2098
  • [8] Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations
    Cong, B
    Liu, JP
    Tanksley, SD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (21) : 13606 - 13611
  • [9] TISSUE ORIGINS, CELL LINEAGES AND PATTERNS OF CELL-DIVISION IN THE DEVELOPING DERMAL SYSTEM OF THE FRUIT OF VITIS-VINIFERA L
    CONSIDINE, JA
    KNOX, RB
    [J]. PLANTA, 1981, 151 (05) : 403 - 412
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT OF FLESHY FRUITS
    COOMBE, BG
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1976, 27 : 207 - 228