Evidence-Based Evaluation of Practice and Innovation in Physical Therapy Using the IDEAL-Physio Framework

被引:16
作者
Beard, David [1 ,2 ]
Hamilton, David [3 ]
Davies, Loretta [1 ,2 ]
Cook, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Hirst, Allison [4 ]
McCulloch, Peter [4 ]
Paez, Arsenio [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, RCS Surg Intervent Trial Unit, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Clin Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Kellogg Coll, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci,Dept Continui, Oxford OX1 2JA, England
[6] Northeastern Univ, Coll Profess Studies, Dept Phys Therapy Movement & Rehabil Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2018年 / 98卷 / 02期
关键词
INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; REHABILITATION; QUALITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; CHALLENGES; GUIDELINES; MEDICINE; EXERCISE; SURGERY; STROKE;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzx103
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The IDEAL framework is an established method for initial and ongoing evaluations of innovation and practice for complex health care interventions. First derived for surgical sciences and embedded at a global level for evaluating surgery/surgical devices, the IDEAL framework is based on the principle that innovation and evaluation in clinical practice can, and should, evolve together in an ordered manner: from conception to development and then to validation by appropriate clinical studies and, finally, longer-term follow-up. This framework is highly suited to other complex, nonpharmacological interventions, such as physical therapist interventions. This perspective outlines the application of IDEAL to physical therapy in the new IDEAL-Physio framework. The IDEAL-Physio framework comprises 5 stages. In stage 1, the idea phase, formal data collection should begin. Stage 2a is the phase for iterative improvement and adjustment with thorough data recording. Stage 2b involves the onset of formal evaluation using systematically collected group or cohort data. Stage 3 is the phase for formal comparative assessment of treatment, usually involving randomized studies. Stage 4 involves long-term follow-up. The IDEAL-Physio framework is recommended as a method for guiding and evaluating both innovation and practice in physical therapy, with the overall goal of providing better evidence-based care. © 2017 American Physical Therapy Association.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 121
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] *AM PHYS THER ASS, P06160605 HOD AM PHY
  • [2] American Physical Therapy Association, VIS STAT PHYS THER P
  • [3] [Anonymous], GUID PHYS THER PRACT
  • [4] Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 1 Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
    Barkun, Jeffrey S.
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Maddern, Guy J.
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) : 1089 - 1096
  • [5] Advancing rehabilitation research: An interactionist perspective to guide question and design
    Bartlett, Doreen J.
    Macnab, Jennifer
    Macarthur, Colin
    Mandich, Angie
    Magill-Evans, Joyce
    Young, Nancy L.
    Beal, Deryk
    Conti-Becker, Angela
    Polatajko, Helene J.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 28 (19) : 1169 - 1176
  • [6] Bjorn M, 1998, J Card Fail, V4, P225, DOI 10.1016/S1071-9164(98)80009-2
  • [7] Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Titcomb, D. R.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Hollowood, A. D.
    Barham, C. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 544 - 551
  • [8] CLINICIAN USE OF RESEARCH FINDINGS - A REVIEW OF LITERATURE WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR PHYSICAL-THERAPISTS
    BOHANNON, RW
    LEVEAU, BF
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1986, 66 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [9] Disclosure, Consent, and the Exercise of Patient Autonomy in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Content Analysis of the Conceptual Literature
    Bracken-Roche, Dearbhail
    Bell, Emily
    Karpowicz, Lila
    Racine, Eric
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 21 (06): : 331 - 352