Practical countermeasures for the aerodynamic performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges with open decks

被引:2
作者
Zhou, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yongxin [1 ]
Ge, Yaojun [1 ]
Mendis, Priyan [2 ]
Mohotti, Damith [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
cable-stayed bridge; open deck; aerodynamic shape selection method; aerodynamic countermeasures; flutter stability; vortex-induced vibration performance; VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION; BOX GIRDERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Open decks are a widely used deck configuration in long-span cable-stayed bridges; however, incorporating aerodynamic countermeasures are advisable to achieve better aerodynamic performance than a bluff body deck alone. A sectional model of an open deck cable-stayed bridge with a main span of 400 m was selected to conduct a series of wind tunnel tests. The influences of five practical aerodynamic countermeasures on flutter and vortex-induced vibration (VIV) performance were investigated and are presented in this paper. The results show that an aerodynamic shape selection procedure can be used to evaluate the flutter stability of decks with respect to different terrain types and structural parameters. In addition, the VIV performance of Pi-shaped girders for driving comfortableness and safety requirements were evaluated. Among these aerodynamic countermeasures, apron boards and wind fairings can improve the aerodynamic performance to some extent, while horizontal guide plates with 5% of the total deck width show a significant influence on the flutter stability and VIV. A wind fairing with an angle of 55 degrees showed the best overall control effect but led to more lock-in regions of VIV. The combination of vertical stabilisers and airflow-depressing boards was found to be superior to other countermeasures and effectively boosted aerodynamic performance; specifically, vertical stabilisers significantly contribute to improving flutter stability and suppressing vertical VIV, while airflow-depressing boards are helpful in reducing torsional VIV.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 239
页数:17
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Collings David., 2005, STEEL CONCRETE COMPO
  • [2] [董锐 Dong Rui], 2012, [哈尔滨工业大学学报, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology], V44, P109
  • [3] Garg V.K., 1984, DYNAMICS RAILWAY VEH
  • [4] Recent development of bridge aerodynamics in China
    Ge, Y. J.
    Xiang, H. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (6-7) : 736 - 768
  • [5] Irwin P.A., 1984, P 12 C IABSE VANC BR
  • [6] Japanese Road Association, 1991, WIND RES DES SPEC RO
  • [7] Investigation and control of vortex-induced vibration of twin box girders
    Laima, Shujin
    Li, Hui
    Chen, Wenli
    Li, Fengchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 39 : 205 - 221
  • [8] Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex shedding response
    Larsen, Allan
    Wall, Alanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2012, 104 : 159 - 165
  • [9] Ministry of Communication of the People's Republic of China, 2004, D60012004 JTGT MIN C
  • [10] Investigation on aerodynamic and structural countermeasures for cable-stayed bridge with 2-edge I-shaped girder
    Murakami, T
    Takeda, K
    Takao, M
    Yui, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2002, 90 (12-15) : 2143 - 2151