Ultrastructural and in vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of interface after Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in rabbits

被引:7
作者
Chen, Minjie [1 ]
Gong, Lan [1 ]
Xu, Jianjiang [1 ]
Zhu, Wenqing [1 ]
Devine, Erin E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, EYE & ENT Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Shanghai 200031, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Madison, WI USA
关键词
confocal microscopy; endothelial keratoplasty; interface; wound healing;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02225.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study healing at the donorrecipient interface after Descemets Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in rabbits by ultrastructural and in vivo confocal microscopic evaluation. Methods: The right eye of eight New Zealand White rabbits underwent DSEK. Postoperatively, each rabbit was subjected to routine slitlamp examination daily for 2 weeks and then weekly for 6 weeks. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation was performed at 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Two rabbits were randomly chosen at 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks for transmission electron microscopic examination. Results: Interface haze decreased with each follow-up visit. Activated keratocytes and associated cellular processes were evident throughout all the followups with in vivo confocal microscopy. Highly reflective particles were left at the interface until the end-point of the study. Upon ultrastructural evaluation, increased rough-surface endoplasmic reticulum in keratocytes, clefts, folds and retained Descemet's membrane (DM) were found. Conclusion: Clefts lack of adherence at the interface and degenerated keratocyte may make up the highly reflective particles. In addition, retained DM does not appear to affect adhesion and very minimal healing is produced at the DM-stroma smooth interface, which permits better quality of vision in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E47
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Wound Healing After Deep Lamellar Keratoplasty in Rabbits [J].
Abdelkader, Almamoun ;
Elewah, El-Sayed M. ;
Kaufman, Herbert E. .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 128 (01) :75-80
[2]   Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Bahar, Irit ;
Kaiserman, Igor ;
McAllum, Penny ;
Slomovic, Allan ;
Rootman, David .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (09) :1525-1533
[3]   Busin Guide vs Forceps for the Insertion of the Donor Lenticule in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty [J].
Bahar, Irit ;
Kaiserman, Igor ;
Sansanayudh, Wiwan ;
Levinger, Eliya ;
Rootman, David S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 147 (02) :220-226
[4]   Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty in endothelial dysfunctions: Three-month results in 75 eyes [J].
Basak, Samar K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 56 (04) :291-296
[5]   The Histology of Graft Adhesion in Descemet Stripping with Endothelial Keratoplasty [J].
Caldwell, Matthew C. ;
Afshari, Natalie A. ;
Decroos, Francis C. ;
Proia, Alan D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 148 (02) :277-281
[6]   Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better? [J].
Dapena, Isabel ;
Ham, Lisanne ;
Melles, Gerrit R. J. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) :299-307
[7]   Long-term histopathologic findings in human corneal wounds after refractive surgical procedures [J].
Dawson, DG ;
Edelhauser, HF ;
Grossniklaus, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 139 (01) :168-178
[8]   Confocal microscopy study of donor-recipient interface after Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty [J].
Espana, E. M. ;
Huang, B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 94 (07) :903-908
[9]   Histologic and ultrastructural findings in a case of traumatic graft failure in deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty - A clinicopathologic case report [J].
Gooi, Patrick ;
Robinson, Jennifer W. ;
Brownstein, Seymour ;
Rocha, Guillermo .
CORNEA, 2007, 26 (07) :853-857
[10]   Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty [J].
Gorovoy, Mark S. .
CORNEA, 2006, 25 (08) :886-889