The Impact of Telemedicine Visits on the Controlling High Blood Pressure Quality Measure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:9
作者
Ye, Siqin [1 ,2 ]
Anstey, D. Edmund [1 ]
Grauer, Anne [1 ]
Metser, Gil [1 ]
Moise, Nathalie [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Joseph [2 ,3 ]
Kronish, Ian [1 ,2 ]
Abdalla, Marwah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Irving Med Ctr, Dept Med, 622 West 168th St,PH 9-318, New York, NY 10033 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Irving Med Ctr, Ctr Behav Cardiovasc Hlth, New York, NY 10033 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
telemedicine; hypertension; blood pressure; quality of care; impact; COVID-19; cohort; cardiology; telehealth; retrospective;
D O I
10.2196/32403
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Telemedicine visit use vastly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this has had an uncertain impact on cardiovascular care quality. Objective: We sought to examine the association between telemedicine visits and the failure to meet the Controlling High Blood Pressure (BP) quality measure from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 32,727 adult patients with hypertension who were seen in primary care and cardiology clinics at an urban, academic medical center from February to December 2020. The primary outcome was a failure to meet the Controlling High Blood Pressure quality measure, which was defined as having no BP recorded or having a last recorded BP of =140/90 mm Hg (ie, poor BP control). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between telemedicine visit use during the study period (none, 1 telemedicine visit, or =2 telemedicine visits) and poor BP control; we adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: During the study period, no BP was recorded for 2.3% (486/20,745) of patients with in-person visits only, 27.1% (1863/6878) of patients with 1 telemedicine visit, and 25% (1277/5104) of patients with =2 telemedicine visits. After adjustment, telemedicine use was associated with poor BP control (1 telemedicine visit: odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.94-2.18; P<.001; =2 telemedicine visits: OR 2.49, 95% CI 2.31-2.68; P<.001; reference: in-person visits only). This effect disappeared when the analysis was restricted to patients with at least 1 recorded BP (1 telemedicine visit: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95; P=.001; =2 telemedicine visits: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99; P=.03). Conclusions: Increased telemedicine visit use is associated with poorer performance on the Controlling High Blood Pressure quality measure. However, telemedicine visit use may not negatively impact BP control when BP is recorded.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Use and Content of Primary Care Office-Based vs Telemedicine Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US
    Alexander, G. Caleb
    Tajanlangit, Matthew
    Heyward, James
    Mansour, Omar
    Qato, Dima M.
    Stafford, Randall S.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (10)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, HTN 2 NQF 0018 CONTR
  • [3] Inequities in Hypertension Control in the United States Exposed and Exacerbated by COVID-19 and the Role of Home Blood Pressure and Virtual Health Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Bress, Adam P.
    Cohen, Jordana B.
    Anstey, David Edmund
    Conroy, Molly B.
    Ferdinand, Keith C.
    Fontil, Valy
    Margolis, Karen L.
    Muntner, Paul
    Millar, Morgan M.
    Okuyemi, Kolawole S.
    Rakotz, Michael K.
    Reynolds, Kristi
    Safford, Monika M.
    Shimbo, Daichi
    Stuligross, John
    Green, Beverly B.
    Mohanty, April F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [4] Controlling high blood pressure (CBP), US
  • [5] Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Eberly, Lauren A.
    Kallan, Michael J.
    Julien, Howard M.
    Haynes, Norrisa
    Khatana, Sameed Ahmed M.
    Nathan, Ashwin S.
    Snider, Christopher
    Chokshi, Neel P.
    Eneanya, Nwamaka D.
    Takvorian, Samuel U.
    Anastos-Wallen, Rebecca
    Chaiyachati, Krisda
    Ambrose, Marietta
    O'Quinn, Rupal
    Seigerman, Matthew
    Goldberg, Lee R.
    Leri, Damien
    Choi, Katherine
    Gitelman, Yevginiy
    Kolansky, Daniel M.
    Cappola, Thomas P.
    Ferrari, Victor A.
    Hanson, C. William
    Deleener, Mary Elizabeth
    Adusumalli, Srinath
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (12)
  • [6] Telemedicine Outpatient Cardiovascular Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic Bridging or Opening the Digital Divide?
    Eberly, Lauren A.
    Khatana, Sameed Ahmed M.
    Nathan, Ashwin S.
    Snider, Christopher
    Julien, Howard M.
    Deleener, Mary Elizabeth
    Adusumalli, Srinath
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 142 (05) : 510 - 512
  • [7] Telehealth consultations in general practice during a pandemic lockdown: survey and interviews on patient experiences and preferences
    Imlach, Fiona
    McKinlay, Eileen
    Middleton, Lesley
    Kennedy, Jonathan
    Pledger, Megan
    Russell, Lynne
    Churchward, Marianna
    Cumming, Jacqueline
    McBride-Henry, Karen
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [8] Assessing Telemedicine Unreadiness Among Older Adults in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Lam, Kenneth
    Lu, Amy D.
    Shi, Ying
    Covinsky, Kenneth E.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (10) : 1389 - 1391
  • [9] COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the field
    Mann, Devin M.
    Chen, Ji
    Chunara, Rumi
    Testa, Paul A.
    Nov, Oded
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (07) : 1132 - 1135
  • [10] Paying for Telemedicine After the Pandemic
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    Bhatia, R. Sacha
    Snoswell, Centaine L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (05): : 431 - 432