Broad Versus Narrow Traits: Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility as Predictors of Academic Criteria

被引:68
作者
de Vries, Anita [1 ]
de Vries, Reinout E. [1 ]
Born, Marise Ph. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Conscientiousness; Honesty-Humility; Integrity; bandwidth-fidelity; grade point average; counterproductive academic behaviour; HEXACO PERSONALITY-INVENTORY; PERSONNEL-SELECTION; BIG; 5; COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIORS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; RELATIVE WEIGHT; 5-FACTOR MODELS; DIMENSIONS; INTEGRITY; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1002/per.795
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent research has suggested that the six-dimensional personality model, and especially the dimension Honesty-Humility/Integrity, adds incremental validity to the prediction of important criteria. We expected both this dimension and the dimension Conscientiousness to explain incremental variance in two academic criteria, namely grade point average (GPA) and counterproductive academic behaviour (CAB). In addition, we expected the more specific, so-called narrow traits of Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility/Integrity to be stronger predictors of academic criteria than the broad traits. To test these expectations, two studies were conducted using the HEXACO Personality Inventory Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) and the Multicultural Personality Test-Big Six (MPT-BS). The results confirmed our expectations and suggest that academic criteria may be predicted with greater accuracy by focusing on the narrow traits of Conscientiousness and Honesty-Humility/Integrity. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 348
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]   Conscientiousness and Achievement Motivation Predict Performance [J].
Richardson, Michelle ;
Abraham, Charles .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2009, 23 (07) :589-605
[52]   Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs [J].
Robins, RW ;
Beer, JS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (02) :340-352
[53]  
ROBINSON SL, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P555, DOI 10.5465/256693
[54]   INTEGRITY TESTING FOR PERSONNEL-SELECTION - AN UPDATE [J].
SACKETT, PR ;
BURRIS, LR ;
CALLAHAN, C .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 42 (03) :491-529
[55]   The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors [J].
Salgado, JF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 10 (1-2) :117-125
[56]   The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings [J].
Schmidt, FL ;
Hunter, JE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (02) :262-274
[57]  
Schneider RJ, 1996, J ORGAN BEHAV, V17, P639, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<639::AID-JOB3828>3.0.CO
[58]  
2-9
[59]   Study motivation under social temptation; effects of trait procrastination [J].
Schouwenburg, HC ;
Groenewoud, J .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (02) :229-240
[60]  
Ziegler M., 2010, EUROPEAN J PERSONALI, V24, P1