Biomechanical analysis of the drilling parameters for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head

被引:4
|
作者
Yuan, DaiZhu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, ZhanYu [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Long [2 ,3 ]
Zou, Qiang [2 ,3 ]
Hua, DaWei [2 ]
Zou, ZiHao [2 ]
Ye, Chuan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Med Coll, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Guiyang 550004, Peoples R China
[3] Guizhou Med Univ, Ctr Tissue Engn & Stem Cells, Guiyang 550004, Peoples R China
关键词
Osteonecrosis; Core decompression; Finite element analysis; Parameter; Biomechanics; CORE DECOMPRESSION; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE; NECK; FRACTURES; FIXATION; STRENGTH; PLATE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106737
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Core decompression is a surgical procedure commonly used to treat the early osteonecrosis of the femoral head. However, It is not known whether different drilling parameters affect postoperative biomechanical strength. This study aimed to analyze the mechanical stability of different drilling locations and diameters of core decompression using finite element analysis.Methods: Finite element models were established based on computed tomography images obtained from five healthy participants, including the different drilling locations (Lesser trochanter: Above, Parallel, and Below) and diameters. Biomechanical parameters including stiffness and stress were evaluated under slow running loads.Results: At the same drilling diameter, the femoral stiffness was highest ( p < 0.05) in the Above group and lowest in the Below group, while the maximum equivalent stress of the entry area and the necrotic area was highest ( p < 0.05) in the Below group and lowest in the Above group. With the increase of drilling diameters, the stiffness decreased and its decreased percentage comparing the preoperative: Above (1.06-8.82%), Parallel (2.51-13.61%), and Below (3.99-15.06%). The maximum equivalent stress of the entry area and necrotic area increased as the drilling diameter increased, and its increased percentage comparing the preoperative, for the entry area: Above (14.11-219.58%), Parallel (35.91-306.37%), and Below (46.12-240.98%); for the necrotic area: Above (13.64-114.69%), Parallel (29.37-187.76%), and Below (44.76-202.10%). The range of safety drilling parameters (SDP) was obtained (Below < 9 mm, Parallel < 11 mm, and Above < 13 mm) by comparing the maximum equivalent stress of two areas and its yield strength. For patients of different sizes and normal bone mineral density (BMD), the maximum equivalent stress of the two areas did not exceed its yield strength using the range of SDP, except for the patients with abnormal BMD (Osteoporosis) or high body mass index (BMI >= 28 kg/m 2 ). Conclusions: The biomechanical properties of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head deceased with increasing drilling diameters parameters, especially at the location below the lesser trochanter. The SDP (Below < 9 mm, Parallel < 11 mm, and Above < 13 mm) is a suitable reference for most patients to perform slow running postoperatively, while it may be not suitable for patients with osteoporosis or obesity.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Etiology, imaging and treatment
    Malizos, Konstantinos N.
    Karantanas, Apostolos H.
    Varitimidis, Sokratis E.
    Dailiana, Zoe H.
    Bargiotas, Konstantinos
    Maris, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 63 (01) : 16 - 28
  • [22] Guideline for Diagnostic and Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
    Chen, Wei-Heng
    Chen, Sheng-bao
    Cheng, Li-ming
    Gao, Peng
    Guo, Wan-shou
    He, Wei
    Kang, Peng-de
    Li, Zi-rong
    Li, Jing
    Qu, Hui
    Qiu, Gui-xing
    Sun, Wei
    Wang, Yi-sheng
    Wang, Zheng-yi
    Wang, Wei-guo
    Wang, Kun-zheng
    Wang, Jing-gui
    Weng, Xi-sheng
    Xing, Geng-yan
    Yu, Nan-sheng
    Yang, Shu-hua
    Yan, Zuo-qin
    Zhang, Chang-qing
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhao, De-wei
    Zhu, Zhen-zhong
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2015, 7 (03) : 200 - 207
  • [23] Are the results of multiple drilling and alendronate for osteonecrosis of the femoral head better than those of multiple drilling? A pilot study
    Kang, Pengde
    Pei, Fuxing
    Shen, Bin
    Zhou, Zongke
    Yang, Jing
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2012, 79 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [24] Optimal drilling at femoral head-neck junction for treatment of the femoral head necrosis: Experimental and numerical evaluation
    Tran, Thanh Ngoc
    Baltaci, Yeliz
    Winter, Philipp
    Tschernig, Thomas
    Landgraeber, Stefan
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2023, 248
  • [25] Network meta-analysis of invasive treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head
    Yingchun Li
    Xiuying Ma
    Bo Dong
    Yue Li
    Zhuang Liang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19
  • [26] Analysis of the efficacy of drilling decompression autologous bone marrow and allogeneic bone grafting in the treatment of HIV-positive patients with early osteonecrosis of the femoral head
    Li, Shengtao
    Wang, Jie
    Ma, Rui
    Zhao, Changsong
    Gao, Zhengrong
    Quan, Xuemin
    Zhang, Qiang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [27] Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
    Babis, George C.
    Sakellariou, Vasileios
    Parvizi, Javad
    Soucacos, Panayiotis
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 34 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [28] Etiological and clinical analysis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Chinese patients
    Wang Xing-shan
    Zhuang Qian-yu
    Weng Xi-sheng
    Lin Jin
    Jin Jin
    Qian Wen-wei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (02) : 290 - 295
  • [29] Effects of electrical stimulation in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head
    Fornell, Salvador
    Ribera, Juan
    Mella, Mario
    Carranza, Andres
    Serrano-Toledano, David
    Domecq, Gabriel
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [30] Joint-preserving procedures for osteonecrosis of the femoral head
    Atilla, Bulent
    Bakircioglu, Sancar
    Shope, Alexander J.
    Parvizi, Javad
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2019, 4 (12): : 647 - 658