Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING | 2011年 / 6卷
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multicenter Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interspinous Fusion Device
    Falowski, Steven M.
    Mangal, Vipul
    Pope, Jason
    Patel, Anish
    Coleman, Mark
    Kendall, Dan
    Brouillette, Richard
    Fishman, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 1525 - 1531
  • [32] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication
    Vohanka, S.
    Adamova, B. Micankova
    [J]. CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2009, 72 (05) : 405 - 417
  • [33] Outpatient minimally invasive spine surgery using endoscopy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis among obese patients
    Hudak, Elizabeth M.
    Perry, Michael W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 12 (03) : 156 - 159
  • [34] Interspinous process decompression is associated with a reduction in opioid analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Staats, Peter S.
    Block, Jon E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 11 : 2943 - 2948
  • [35] Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kobayashi, Yuto
    Tamai, Koji
    Toyoda, Hiromitsu
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Hoshino, Masatoshi
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Takahashi, Shinji
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    [J]. SPINE, 2021, 46 (18) : 1218 - 1225
  • [36] Effectiveness and safety of interspinous spacer versus decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xin, Jian-Hai
    Che, Jia-Ju
    Wang, Zhe
    Chen, Yu-Ming
    Leng, Bing
    Wang, Da-Lin
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (46) : E36048
  • [37] Microendoscopic discectomy versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Yi, Weihong
    Tang, Yu
    Yang, Dazhi
    Huang, Wenhua
    Liu, Huan
    Sun, Ziqi
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Yue
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (24) : E20743
  • [38] Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN)
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Grider, Jay S.
    Pope, Jason E.
    Lamer, Tim J.
    Wahezi, Sayed E.
    Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
    Falowski, Steven
    Tolba, Reda
    Shah, Jay M.
    Strand, Natalie
    Escobar, Alex
    Malinowski, Mark
    Bux, Anjum
    Jassal, Navdeep
    Hah, Jennifer
    Weisbein, Jacqueline
    Tomycz, Nestor D.
    Jameson, Jessica
    Petersen, Erika A.
    Sayed, Dawood
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 1325 - 1354
  • [39] Two-Year Evaluation of the X-STOP Interspinous Spacer in Different Primary Patient Populations With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Because of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Hartjen, Charles A.
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    Hsu, Ken Y.
    Zucherman, James F.
    Hsu, Emily H.
    Skidmore, Grant A.
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (07): : 305 - 311
  • [40] Success and Failure of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Focal Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With and Without Deformity
    Kelleher, Michael O.
    Timlin, Marcus
    Persaud, Oma
    Rampersaud, Yoga Raja
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : E981 - E987