Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING | 2011年 / 6卷
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS® in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication
    Van Meirhaeghe, Jan
    Fransen, Patrick
    Morelli, Daniele
    Craig, Niall J. A.
    Godde, Gregor
    Mihalyi, Attila
    Collignon, Frederic
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (12) : 2565 - 2572
  • [22] 24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison
    Baranidharan, Ganesan
    Bretherton, Beatrice
    Feltbower, Richard G.
    Timothy, Jake
    Khan, Almas Latif
    Subramanian, Ashok
    Ahmed, Mushtaq
    Crowther, Tracey A.
    Radford, Helen
    Gupta, Harun
    Chandramohan, Muthusamy
    Beall, Douglas P.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Hedman, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 2079 - 2097
  • [23] Percutaneous Treatment of Lumbar Compression Fracture with Canal Stenosis and Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication: Combining Kyphoplasty and Interspinous Spacer
    Bonaldi, Giuseppe
    Cianfoni, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (11) : 1437 - 1441
  • [24] The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Grider, Jay S.
    Pope, Jason E.
    Falowski, Steven
    Lamer, Tim J.
    Calodney, Aaron
    Provenzano, David A.
    Sayed, Dawood
    Lee, Eric
    Wahezi, Sayed E.
    Kim, Chong
    Hunter, Corey
    Gupta, Mayank
    Benyamin, Rasmin
    Chopko, Bohdan
    Demesmin, Didier
    Diwan, Sudhir
    Gharibo, Christopher
    Kapural, Leo
    Kloth, David
    Klagges, Brian D.
    Harned, Michael
    Simopoulos, Tom
    McJunkin, Tory
    Carlson, Jonathan D.
    Rosenquist, Richard W.
    Lubenow, Timothy R.
    Mekhail, Nagy
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (03) : 250 - 274
  • [25] Interspinous Spacer versus Traditional Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Zhou, Yong
    Li, Qing-Long
    Wu, Xin-Lei
    Jin, Yong-Long
    Luo, Peng
    Chi, Yong-Long
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [26] Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with microdecompression and interspinous distraction device insertion. A case series
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Christodoulou, Pavlos
    Kapoutsis, Dimitrios
    Gelalis, Ioannis
    Vraggalas, Vasilios
    Beris, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2012, 7
  • [27] Short-term effects of minimally invasive dynamic neutralization system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: An observational study
    Tu, Ji
    Hua, Wenbin
    Li, Wentian
    Liu, Wei
    Luo, Rongjin
    Li, Shuai
    Zhang, Yukun
    Kang, Liang
    Wang, Kun
    Song, Yu
    Yang, Shuahua
    Yang, Cao
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (22)
  • [28] Percutaneous Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with a New Interspinous Device
    Salvatore Masala
    Roberto Fiori
    Dario Alberto Bartolucci
    Tommaso Volpi
    Eros Calabria
    Federica Novegno
    Giovanni Simonetti
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 368 - 374
  • [29] Technical Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lauryssen, Carl
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S287 - S293
  • [30] Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study
    Patil, Chirag G.
    Sarmiento, J. Manuel
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Nuno, Miriam
    Liu, John C.
    Walia, Sartaaj
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (08) : 1484 - 1492