Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being

被引：108

作者：

VanderWeele, Tyler J. ^{[1
]}

Trudel-Fitzgerald, Claudia ^{[1
]}

Allin, Paul ^{[2
]}

Farrelly, Colin ^{[3
]}

Fletcher, Guy ^{[4
]}

Frederick, Donald E. ^{[5
]}

Hall, Jon ^{[6
]}

Helliwell, John F. ^{[7
]}

Kim, Eric S. ^{[1
]}

Lauinger, William A. ^{[8
]}

Lee, Matthew T. ^{[5
]}

Lyubomirsky, Sonja ^{[9
]}

Margolis, Seth ^{[9
]}

McNeely, Eileen ^{[1
]}

Messer, Neil ^{[10
]}

Tay, Louis ^{[11
]}

Viswanath, Vish ^{[1
]}

Weziak-Bialowolska, Dorota ^{[1
]}

Kubzansky, Laura D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[2] Imperial Coll London, London, England

[3] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada

[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland

[5] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

[6] United Nations Dev Programme, New York, NY USA

[7] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

[8] Chestnut Hill Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA

[9] Univ Calif Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 USA

[10] Univ Winchester, Winchester, Hants, England

[11] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

来源：

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE | 2020年 / 133卷

关键词：

Well-being; Flourishing; Measurement; Happiness; Surveys; Life satisfaction; Purpose in life; Optimism; Psychology; Public health; COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY; THRIVING CIT; LIFE; SATISFACTION; RELIABILITY; HAPPINESS; PEOPLE; SCALES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106004

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Measures of well-being have proliferated over the past decades. Very little guidance has been available as to which measures to use in what contexts. This paper provides a series of recommendations, based on the present state of knowledge and the existing measures available, of what measures might be preferred in which contexts. The recommendations came out of an interdisciplinary workshop on the measurement of well-being. The recommendations are shaped around the number of items that can be included in a survey, and also based on the differing potential contexts and purposes of data collection such as, for example, government surveys, or multi-use cohort studies, or studies specifically about psychological well-being. The recommendations are not intended to be definitive, but to stimulate discussion and refinement, and to provide guidance to those relatively new to the study of well-being.

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] MEASURES OF ECONOMIC WELL-BEING AS PREDICTORS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
MULLIS, RJ
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (02) : 119 - 135
[2] Recommendations for measurement of well-being
Buehler, Antje
JOURNAL OF MILITARY VETERAN AND FAMILY HEALTH, 2019, 5 : 116 - 135
[3] Well-being: Concepts and measures
Kahn, RL
Juster, FT
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2002, 58 (04) : 627 - 644
[4] SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF WELL-BEING
CAMPBELL, A
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (02) : 117 - 124
[5] A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being
Zhang, Wei
Balloo, Kieran
Hosein, Anesa
Medland, Emma
BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
[6] SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING
MOBERG, DO
REVIEW OF RELIGIOUS RESEARCH, 1984, 25 (04) : 351 - 364
[7] Measures of Community Well-Being: a Template
VanderWeele T.J.
International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2019, 2 (3-4) : 253 - 275
[8] The reliability of subjective well-being measures
Krueger, Alan B.
Schkade, David A.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (8-9) : 1833 - 1845
[9] DEVELOPMENT, GROWTH AND MEASURES OF WELL-BEING
TUCK, B
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1981, 32 (10) : 913 - 916
[10] AN EVALUATION OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING MEASURES
LARSEN, RJ
DIENER, E
EMMONS, RA
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1985, 17 (01) : 1 - 17

← 1 2 3 4 5 →