The Value of Item Response Theory in Clinical Assessment: A Review

被引:229
作者
Thomas, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
item response theory; assessment; clinical; measurement; psychometric theory; latent variable model; HARE PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST; LATENT TRAIT ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; DEPRESSION INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; LONGITUDINAL DATA; RASCH MODEL; SELF-ESTEEM;
D O I
10.1177/1073191110374797
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Item response theory (IRT) and related latent variable models represent modern psychometric theory, the successor to classical test theory in psychological assessment. Although IRT has become prevalent in the measurement of ability and achievement, its contributions to clinical domains have been less extensive. Applications of IRT to clinical assessment are reviewed to appraise its current and potential value. Benefits of IRT include comprehensive analyses and reduction of measurement error, creation of computer adaptive tests, meaningful scaling of latent variables, objective calibration and equating, evaluation of test and item bias, greater accuracy in the assessment of change due to therapeutic intervention, and evaluation of model and person fit. The theory may soon reinvent the manner in which tests are selected, developed, and scored. Although challenges remain to the widespread implementation of IRT, its application to clinical assessment holds great promise. Recommendations for research, test development, and clinical practice are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 307
页数:17
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]   DSM criteria for major depression: evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item response models [J].
Aggen, SH ;
Neale, MC ;
Kendler, KS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (04) :475-487
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GRE General Test
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, American Psychological Association ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
[7]  
Baker F., 2001, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
[8]  
Batchelder W.H., 2010, Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches, P71, DOI [10.1037/12074-004, DOI 10.1037/12074-004]
[9]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2008, MMPI 2 RF MANUAL ADM
[10]  
Bock R.D., 2005, EDUC MEAS-ISSUES PRA, V16, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1997.TB00605.X, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00605.x]