Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?

被引:0
作者
Chung, Paul H. [1 ]
Siegel, Jordan A. [1 ]
Tausch, Timothy J. [1 ]
Klein, Alexandra K. [1 ]
Scott, Jeremy M. [1 ]
Morey, Allen F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Urol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2017年 / 43卷 / 05期
关键词
Penile Prosthesis; Erectile Dysfunction; Surgical Procedures; Operative; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; PEYRONIES-DISEASE; SURGERY; LENGTH; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Many patients who undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) replacement are often upsized to larger cylinders, suggesting the IPP may serve as a tissue expander and increase internal penile length. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cylinder length increases with subsequent IPP insertion. Materials and Methods: We queried American Medical Systems and Coloplast Patient Information Form databases to identify patients who underwent IPP placement and replacement between 2004-2013. Patients were grouped by device type and time to replacement (<2 or >= 2 years). We selected the 2-year mark for subgroup analysis to allow time for tissue expansion to occur and to exclude patients who underwent early explantation (e.g. erosion or infection). Results: Two thousand, seven hundred and forty nine patients (1,532 AMS 700 LGX, 717 AMS 700 CX, and 500 Coloplast Titan) met the inclusion criteria. Mean time between implants was earlier for LGX (29 months) than CX (39 months) and Titan (48 months) patients (p< 0.001). Patients who underwent device replacement at < 2 years did not experience an increase in mean cylinder length. On the contrary, patients who underwent device replacement at >= 2 years did experience significant increases in mean cylinder length (LGX 1.2 cm, CX 1.1 cm, and Titan 0.9 cm, p< 0.001). The mean increases in length at >= 2 years were similar between the 3 devices (p= 0.20). Sixty percent of patients demonstrated increases of > 0.5 cm and 40% demonstrated increases of >= 1 cm. Conclusions: As demonstrated, the IPP may provide tissue expansion over time. Further evaluation is needed to determine if increased cylinder length correlates to increased functional length and patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 916
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Glans ischemia following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery [J].
Hebert, Kevin J. ;
Kohler, Tobias S. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) :824-827
[32]   The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant [J].
Chung, Eric ;
Bettocchi, Carlo ;
Egydio, Paulo ;
Love, Chris ;
Osmonov, Daniar ;
Park, Sean ;
Ralph, David ;
Xin, Zhong Cheng ;
Brock, Gerald .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2022, 19 (09) :534-546
[33]   Infrapubic approach for placement of inflatable penile prosthesis: contemporary review of technique and implications [J].
Jayadevan, Rajiv ;
Eleswarapu, Sriram V. ;
Mills, Jesse N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01) :10-17
[34]   Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of Historical Treatments With a Focus on the Development of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis [J].
Gurtner, Kristen ;
Saltzman, Amanda ;
Hebert, Kristi ;
Laborde, Eric .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2017, 11 (03) :479-486
[35]   A Contemporary Analysis of Dual Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes [J].
Patel, Neal ;
Golan, Ron ;
Halpern, Joshua A. ;
Sun, Tianyi ;
Asafu-Adjei, Abena Denise ;
Chughtai, Bilal ;
Stahl, Peter ;
Sedrakyan, Art ;
Kashanian, James A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) :141-146
[36]   Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report [J].
Trost, L. W. ;
Boonjindasup, A. G. ;
Hellstrom, W. J. G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 27 (03) :86-89
[37]   Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation [J].
Narang, Gopal L. ;
Figler, Bradley D. ;
Coward, Robert M. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 :S869-S880
[38]   Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Ambulatory Setting: A Systematic Review [J].
Segal, Robert L. ;
Siegelbaum, Marc H. ;
Lerner, Brad D. ;
Weinberg, Aaron C. .
SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (02) :338-347
[39]   Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Complication in the Emergency Department [J].
Sedaghat, Farzad ;
Kamona, Aws .
HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (10)
[40]   Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Considerations in Revision Surgery [J].
Wintner, Anton ;
Lentz, Aaron C. .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (04)