Contextual factors influencing pain response to heelstick procedures in preterm infants: What do we know? A systematic review

被引:20
作者
Sellam, Gila [1 ]
Cignacco, Eva L. [1 ]
Craig, Kenneth D. [2 ]
Engberg, Sandra [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Inst Nursing Sci, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Preterm infants; Pain assessment; Pain response; Contextual factors; Heelstick; Systematic review; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REACTIVITY; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Major efforts to develop objective measurement tools for neonatal pain assessment have been made. However, the challenge of measuring pain in neonates remains suggesting that contextual factors (cFs) might alter their responses to pain. Although the role of cFs is increasingly discussed as crucial for pain assessment, they are not well described in the literature and are rarely considered in the clinical setting despite their importance. Aim: To systematically examine studies investigating the impact of cFs on pain response in preterm infants. Method: A literature search was undertaken for the period from 1990 to 2009. Studies reporting the relation between one or more cFs and pain response in preterm infants during a heelstick procedure were considered for inclusion. Results: Twenty-three studies satisfied inclusion criteria. The studies varied relative to their design, sample, analysis procedures, and variables examined. Six categories of cFs emerged: age, pain exposure, health status, therapeutic interventions, behavioral status, and demographic factors. The examined cFs varied in the strength of their association with pain response, although none were invariably related, as evidenced by contradictory findings. In some cases the inconsistencies appeared attributable to methodological limitations in studies. Behavioral and physiological pain responses were not always in agreement as would be expected. Conclusion: This review supports the influence of some cFs on pain response. However, the results remain inconclusive which may be, in part, related to the heterogeneity of the studies. Contextual factors need further investigation for a better understanding of the magnitude of their effect on pain response. (C) 2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:661.e1 / 661.e15
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Influence of gestational age on the EDIN score: an observational study
    Ancora, G.
    Mastrocola, M.
    Bagnara, C.
    Zola, D.
    Plerantoni, L.
    Rossi, G.
    Corvaglia, L.
    Faldella, G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2009, 94 (01): : F35 - F38
  • [2] [Anonymous], ACTA PAEDIAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], PAIN NEONATES INFANT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, Advances in Neonatal Care, DOI DOI 10.1053/ADNC.2001.29593
  • [5] [Anonymous], THESIS MED COLL OHIO
  • [6] Beggs S., 2007, Pain in neonates and infants, P11
  • [7] Vulnerability of the developing brain - Neuronal mechanisms
    Bhutta, AT
    Anand, KJS
    [J]. CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2002, 29 (03) : 357 - +
  • [8] Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units
    Carbajal, Ricardo
    Rousset, Andre
    Danan, Claude
    Coquery, Sarah
    Nolent, Paul
    Ducrocq, Sarah
    Saizou, Carole
    Lapillonne, Alexandre
    Granier, Michele
    Durand, Philippe
    Lenclen, Richard
    Coursol, Anne
    Hubert, Philippe
    de Saint Blanquat, Laure
    Boelle, Pierre-Yves
    Annequin, Daniel
    Cimerman, Patricia
    Anand, K. J. S.
    Breart, Gerard
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (01): : 60 - 70
  • [9] Cignacco E, 2008, SWISS MED WKLY, V138, P635, DOI 2008/43/smw-12288
  • [10] PAIN IN THE PRETERM NEONATE - BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INDEXES
    CRAIG, KD
    WHITFIELD, MF
    GRUNAU, RVE
    LINTON, J
    HADJISTAVROPOULOS, HD
    [J]. PAIN, 1993, 52 (03) : 287 - 299