Statistical Learning of Language: A Meta-Analysis Into 25 Years of Research

被引:20
作者
Isbilen, Erin S. [1 ,2 ]
Christiansen, Morten H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Haskins Labs Inc, 300 George St,900, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[3] Aarhus Univ, Interacting Minds Ctr, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Sch Commun & Culture, Aarhus, Denmark
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Statistical learning; Auditory-linguistic statistical learning; Cross-situational learning; Language; Language acquisition; Meta-analysis; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; WORD SEGMENTATION; HUMAN INFANTS; SPEECH; CUES; FREQUENCY; KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN; IMPLICIT; DEPENDENCIES;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.13198
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Statistical learning is a key concept in our understanding of language acquisition. Ample work has highlighted its role in numerous linguistic functions-yet statistical learning is not a unitary construct, and its consistency across different language properties remains unclear. In a meta-analysis of auditory-linguistic statistical learning research spanning the last 25 years, we evaluated how learning varies across different language properties in infants, children, and adults and surveyed the methodological trends in the literature. We found robust learning across stimuli (syllables, words, etc.) in infants, and across stimuli and structures (adjacent dependencies, non-adjacent dependencies, etc.) in adults, with larger effect sizes when multiple cues were present. However, the analysis also showed significant publication bias and revealed a tendency toward using a narrow range of simplified language properties, including in the strength of the transitional probabilities used during training. Bayes factor analyses revealed prevalent data insensitivity of moderators commonly hypothesized to impact learning, such as the amount of exposure and transitional probability strength, which contradict core theoretical assumptions in the field. Methodological factors, such as the tasks used at test, also significantly impacted effect sizes in adults and children, suggesting that choice of task may critically constrain current theories of how statistical learning operates. Collectively, our results suggest that auditory-linguistic statistical learning has the kind of robustness needed to play a foundational role in language acquisition, but that more research is warranted to reveal its full potential.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [21] Implicit Statistical Learning: A Tale of Two Literatures
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    [J]. TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (03) : 468 - 481
  • [22] Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key
    Conway, Christopher M.
    Bauernschmidt, Althea
    Huang, Sean S.
    Pisoni, David B.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2010, 114 (03) : 356 - 371
  • [23] Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences
    Conway, CM
    Christiansen, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (01) : 24 - 39
  • [24] Craney T. A., 2002, Quality Engineering, V14, P391, DOI 10.1081/QEN-120001878
  • [25] Test-Retest Reliability in Infant Speech Perception Tasks
    Cristia, Alejandrina
    Seidl, Amanda
    Singh, Leher
    Houston, Derek
    [J]. INFANCY, 2016, 21 (05) : 648 - 667
  • [26] Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
    Dienes, Zoltan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [27] Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change
    Diessel, Holger
    [J]. NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 25 (02) : 108 - 127
  • [28] Ellis N.C., 2002, STUDIES 2 LANGUAGE A, V24, P143, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0272263102002024
  • [29] The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words
    Endress, Ansgar D.
    Mehler, Jacques
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 60 (03) : 351 - 367
  • [30] Erickson L.C., 2016, Collabra, V2, P14, DOI DOI 10.1525/COLLABRA.41