Guidelines and recommendations for MRI in breast cancer follow-up: A review

被引:9
|
作者
van Bodegraven, Eduard A. [1 ]
van Raaij, Jeroen C. [1 ]
Van Goethem, Mireille [1 ]
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Gynaecol Oncol Unit,Multidisciplinary Breast Clin, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Breast cancer; Imaging; Follow-up; Recurrence; Guidelines; MRI; PERSONAL HISTORY; RISK-FACTOR; WOMEN; RECURRENCE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Present article will perform a review regarding the current-recommendations of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in routine follow-up after successfully treated breast cancer by surgery, radiation and/or systemic therapy. Methods: For this review, a literature review search was done with the MeSH-terms: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, breast neoplasm, post-operative period and follow-up, according to PRISMA. The literature published between 2006 and 2016 in MedBase, PubMed and Embase was consulted. Results: The 10 articles and 8 guidelines were analysed for their recommendations regarding MRI use in routine follow-up for breast cancer. One article concluded that MRI could influence further policy, all others did not find superiority of MRI over mammography or were inconclusive. One guideline recommended annual MRI for patients with a positive personal history (PPH) for breast cancer without further risk factors, one guideline offered no MRI to these patients and all other guidelines were inconclusive. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence regarding superiority of MRI versus mammography in routine follow-up for patients with a PPH of breast cancer. MRI does not improve survival in all patients and should therefore not be offered to patients in follow-up without increased risk for recurrences. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discrepancies of current recommendations in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review
    Kyriazoglou, Anastasios
    Zagouri, Flora
    Fotiou, Despina
    Dimitrakakis, Constantinos
    Marinopoulos, Spyros
    Zakopoulou, Roubini
    Kaparelou, Maria
    Zygogianni, Anna
    Dimopoulos, Meletios Athanasios
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (05) : 681 - 686
  • [2] Discrepancies of current recommendations in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review
    Anastasios Kyriazoglou
    Flora Zagouri
    Despina Fotiou
    Constantinos Dimitrakakis
    Spyros Marinopoulos
    Roubini Zakopoulou
    Maria Kaparelou
    Anna Zygogianni
    Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
    Breast Cancer, 2019, 26 : 681 - 686
  • [3] Male Breast Cancer: Management and Follow-up Recommendations
    Kiluk, John V.
    Lee, Marie Catherine
    Park, Catherine K.
    Meade, Tammi
    Minton, Susan
    Harris, Eleanor
    Kim, Jongphil
    Laronga, Christine
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (05) : 503 - 509
  • [4] Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET
    Goerres, GW
    Michel, SCA
    Fehr, MK
    Kaim, AH
    Steinert, HC
    Seifert, B
    von Schulthess, GK
    Kubik-Huch, RA
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (07) : 1635 - 1644
  • [5] Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET
    Gerhard W. Goerres
    Sven C. A. Michel
    Mathias K. Fehr
    Achim H. Kaim
    Hans C. Steinert
    Burkhardt Seifert
    Gustav K. von Schulthess
    Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 1635 - 1644
  • [6] Evidence-based follow-up for breast cancer Short review
    Stierer, Michael
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (01) : 60 - 63
  • [7] MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate
    Camps-Herrero, Julia
    Pijnappel, Ruud
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (10) : 6264 - 6270
  • [8] Follow-up and Cancer Survivorship
    Neuman, Heather B.
    Schumacher, Jessica R.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 103 (01) : 169 - 185
  • [9] Patient follow-up after treatment for breast cancer
    Classe, J. -M.
    Sentilhes, L.
    Jaffre, I.
    Mezzadri, M.
    Lefebvre-Lacoeuille, C.
    Dejode, M.
    Catala, L.
    Bordes, V.
    Dravet, F.
    Descamps, P.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (08): : F85 - F88
  • [10] Rational staging and follow-up of colorectal cancer Do guidelines provide further help?
    Juchems, M. S.
    Wessling, J.
    RADIOLOGE, 2019, 59 (09): : 820 - 827