Guidelines and recommendations for MRI in breast cancer follow-up: A review

被引:9
作者
van Bodegraven, Eduard A. [1 ]
van Raaij, Jeroen C. [1 ]
Van Goethem, Mireille [1 ]
Tjalma, Wiebren A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Gynaecol Oncol Unit,Multidisciplinary Breast Clin, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Breast cancer; Imaging; Follow-up; Recurrence; Guidelines; MRI; PERSONAL HISTORY; RISK-FACTOR; WOMEN; RECURRENCE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Present article will perform a review regarding the current-recommendations of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in routine follow-up after successfully treated breast cancer by surgery, radiation and/or systemic therapy. Methods: For this review, a literature review search was done with the MeSH-terms: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, breast neoplasm, post-operative period and follow-up, according to PRISMA. The literature published between 2006 and 2016 in MedBase, PubMed and Embase was consulted. Results: The 10 articles and 8 guidelines were analysed for their recommendations regarding MRI use in routine follow-up for breast cancer. One article concluded that MRI could influence further policy, all others did not find superiority of MRI over mammography or were inconclusive. One guideline recommended annual MRI for patients with a positive personal history (PPH) for breast cancer without further risk factors, one guideline offered no MRI to these patients and all other guidelines were inconclusive. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence regarding superiority of MRI versus mammography in routine follow-up for patients with a PPH of breast cancer. MRI does not improve survival in all patients and should therefore not be offered to patients in follow-up without increased risk for recurrences. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Aetna Inc, MAGN RES IM MRI BREA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BREAST CANC ESTIMATE
[3]   JOURNAL CLUB: Is Screening MRI Indicated for Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer? Analysis Based on Biopsy Results [J].
Arazi-Kleinman, Tal ;
Skair-Levy, Miri ;
Slonimsky, Einat ;
Maly, Bella ;
Uziely, Beatrice ;
Libson, Eugene ;
Sella, Tamar .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) :919-927
[4]   Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes [J].
Benndorf, Matthias ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Vag, Tibor ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Runnebaum, Ingo B. ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (07) :715-721
[5]   Diagnostic Performance of MRI Versus Galactography in Women With Pathologic Nipple Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Berger, Nicole ;
Luparia, Andrea ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro ;
Trimboli, Rubina Manuela ;
Ambrogi, Federico ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (02) :465-471
[6]  
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, MAGN RES IM MRI BREA
[7]   Breast MRI Screening of Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer [J].
Brennan, Sandra ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Morris, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :510-516
[8]  
Cuccurullo V, 2013, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V57, P322
[9]   Personal History of Premenopausal Breast Cancer as a Risk Factor for Referral to Screening Breast MRI [J].
Destounis, Stamatia ;
Arieno, Andrea ;
Morgan, Renee .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (03) :353-357
[10]   Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool [J].
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Tucker, Lorraine ;
Young, Ken C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (02) :141-150