Modified ideal observer model (MIOM) for high-contrast and high-spatial resolution CT imaging tasks

被引:9
作者
Cruz-Bastida, Juan P. [1 ]
Gomez-Cardona, Daniel [1 ]
Garrett, John [1 ]
Szczykutowicz, Timothy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Guang-Hong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biomed Engn, 1550 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
CT; Hi-Res; high-spatial resolution; human observer; image quality; observer model; reconstruction kernel; ROC; VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION; DORFMAN-BERBAUM-METZ; CONE-BEAM CT; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; DETECTABILITY; PERFORMANCE; NOISE; TOMOSYNTHESIS; QUALITY; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12404
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although a variety of mathematical observer models have been developed to predict human observer performance for low contrast lesion detection tasks, their predictive power for high contrast and high spatial resolution discrimination imaging tasks, including those in CT bone imaging, could be limited. The purpose of this work was to develop a modified observer model that has improved correlation with human observer performance for these tasks. Methods: The proposed observer model, referred to as the modified ideal observer model (MIOM), uses a weight function to penalize components in the task function that have less contribution to the actual human observer performance for high contrast and high spatial resolution discrimination tasks. To validate MIOM, both human observer and observer model studies were performed, each using exactly the same CT imaging task [discrimination of a connected component in a high contrast (1000 HU) high spatial resolution bone fracture model (0.3 mm)] and experimental CT image data. For the human observer studies, three physicist observers rated the connectivity of the fracture model using a five-point Likert scale; for the observer model studies, a total of five observer models, including both conventional models and the proposed MIOM, were used to calculate the discrimination capability of the CT images in resolving the connected component. Images used in the studies encompassed nine different reconstruction kernels. Correlation between human and observer model performance for these kernels were quantified using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (q). After the validation study, an example application of MIOM was presented, in which the observer model was used to select the optimal reconstruction kernel for a High-Resolution (Hi-Res, GE Healthcare) CT scan technique. Results: The performance of the proposed MIOM correlated well with that of the human observers with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient q of 0.88 (P = 0.003). In comparison, the value of q was 0.05 (P = 0.904) for the ideal observer, 0.05 (P = 0.904) for the non-prewhitening observer, - 0.18 (P = 0.634) for the non-prewhitening observer with eye filter and internal noise, and 0.30 (P = 0.427) for the prewhitening observer with eye filter and internal noise. Using the validated MIOM, the optimal reconstruction kernel for the Hi-Res mode to perform high spatial resolution and high contrast discrimination imaging tasks was determined to be the HD Ultra kernel at the center of the scan field of view (SFOV), or the Lung kernel at the peripheral region of the SFOV. This result was consistent with visual observations of nasal CT images of an in vivo canine subject. Conclusion: Compared with other observer models, the proposed modified ideal observer model provides significantly improved correlation with human observers for high contrast and high spatial resolution CT imaging tasks. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:4496 / 4505
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Abbey CK, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5116, P393, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_55
  • [2] Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk
    Barrett, Harrison H.
    Myers, Kyle J.
    Hoeschen, Christoph
    Kupinski, Matthew A.
    Little, Mark P.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (02) : R1 - R75
  • [3] MODEL OBSERVERS FOR ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY
    BARRETT, HH
    YAO, J
    ROLLAND, JP
    MYERS, KJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1993, 90 (21) : 9758 - 9765
  • [4] BOONE JM, 2010, DIG MAMM 10 INT, V6136, P591
  • [5] Burgess A.E., 1991, Vision, P431
  • [6] VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .4. OBSERVER INCONSISTENCY
    BURGESS, AE
    COLBORNE, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (04): : 617 - 627
  • [7] Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects
    Burgess, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1999, 16 (03): : 694 - 704
  • [8] Visual signal detectability with two noise components: Anomalous masking effects
    Burgess, AE
    Li, X
    Abbey, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1997, 14 (09) : 2420 - 2442
  • [9] Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise
    Burgess, AE
    Jacobson, FL
    Judy, PF
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) : 419 - 437
  • [10] An Improved Index of Image Quality for Task-based Performance of CT Iterative Reconstruction across Three Commercial Implementations
    Christianson, Olav
    Chen, Joseph J. S.
    Yang, Zhitong
    Saiprasad, Ganesh
    Dima, Alden
    Filliben, James J.
    Peskin, Adele
    Trimble, Christopher
    Siegel, Eliot L.
    Samei, Ehsan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (03) : 725 - 734