STAMP-based causal analysis of China-Donghuang oil transportation pipeline leakage and explosion accident

被引:55
作者
Gong, Yunhua [1 ]
Li, Yuntao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Mech Storage & Transportat Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Accident causation model; Accident analysis; STAMP; Pipeline transportation; SAFETY; MODEL; CONSEQUENCES; ACCIMAP; HFACS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.001
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The methods used by researchers and accident investigators to analyze or investigate accidents are critical for understanding the underlying causes and for proposing improvement measures. As a systematic analysis model, Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) is used in the aviation, maritime, and railway transportation industries, among others. To the best of the author's knowledge, no systematic analysis approach has been applied in the long-distance pipeline transportation industry. However, the pipeline transportation system is increasingly being considered a complex socio-technical system that requires the exploration of accident causes from a systematic viewpoint. The aims of this paper are to identify the causal factors of the China-Donghuang oil transportation pipeline leakage and explosion accident through a systematic method and illustrate the appropriateness of applying STAMP to the analysis of incidents in the long-distance pipeline transportation industry. To achieve this, a systematic analysis based on STAMP is conducted on the China-Donghuang oil transportation pipeline leakage and explosion accident. The analysis results expand the causal analysis beyond immediate failures, to causes from a systematic perspective, and illustrate the utility of applying the STAMP model to the pipeline transportation domain.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 413
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] STAMP - Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model?
    Altabbakh, Hanan
    AlKazimi, Mohammad A.
    Murray, Susan
    Grantham, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 32 : 109 - 119
  • [2] [Anonymous], B318S2012 ASME
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, 17 SAF CRIT SYST S B
  • [4] Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, 2017, CEPA MEMB PERF
  • [5] Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents
    Celik, Metin
    Cebi, Selcuk
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [6] Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS
    Chauvin, Christine
    Lardjane, Salim
    Morel, Gael
    Clostermann, Jean-Pierre
    Langard, Benoit
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 59 : 26 - 37
  • [7] Conservation of Clean Air and Water in Europe, 2011, PERF EUR CROSS COUNT
  • [8] [狄彦 Di Yan], 2013, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal(CSSJ)], V23, P109
  • [9] A perspective on Seveso accident based on cause-consequences analysis by three different methods
    Fabiano, B.
    Vianello, C.
    Reverberi, A. P.
    Lunghi, E.
    Maschio, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 49 : 18 - 35
  • [10] Fu G., 2016, J ACCID PREV, V2, P7