Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach

被引:38
作者
Barth, Nina-Christin [1 ]
Doell, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Phys Geog, Altenhoferallee 1, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Flood protection; Ecosystem service cascade; Replacement costs; Avoided damage costs; Valuation; Flood hazard map; ECONOMIC VALUE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WETLANDS; VALUATION; FRAMEWORK; MONETARY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We present a method for assessing the ecosystem service (ES) flood protection of riparian wetlands and apply it to a riparian forest in Germany. The suggested workflow implements a cascade approach to ES characterization in which current provisioning is assessed in four steps: (1) qualitative description of biophysical processes and structures, (2) definition and quantification of main and additional ecosystem functions, (3) qualitative description of economic and social benefits and (4) valuation. Future provisioning is addressed by identifying pressures and analyzing potential enhancements. Using flood hazard and risk maps produced in response to the EU floods directive, quantification of the ecosystem function water retention as well as monetary valuation by the replacement cost and avoided damage cost methods were achieved without site-specific hydrological-hydraulic modeling. Technical structures with the same water retention volume as the investigated ecosystem in case of an extreme flood would cost 68 million EUR (equivalent ES value EUR 1900/ha/yr). In case of a 10-year flood, the riparian forest avoids damage costs of at least 26 million EUR (EUR 4300/ha/yr). We provide suggestions for standardizing the application of both monetary valuation methods and discuss their information content as well approaches for non-monetary valuation of the ES flood protection. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 52
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
AG Boden, 2005, Bodenkundliche kartieranleitung, V5th ed.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[3]  
[Anonymous], UB UB MOGL VERM RHEI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlands
[7]   Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis [J].
Brander, Luke ;
Brouwer, Roy ;
Wagtendonk, Alfred .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 56 :89-96
[8]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210
[9]   An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Fazey, Ioan ;
Cooper, Rob ;
Hyde, Tony ;
Kenter, Jasper O. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 83 :67-78
[10]   A guiding framework for ecosystem services monetization in ecological-economic modeling [J].
Cordier, Mateo ;
Perez Agundez, Jose A. ;
Hecq, Walter ;
Hamaide, Bertrand .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 :86-96