Benefits of an integrated water and nutrient reuse system for urban areas in semi-arid developing countries

被引:25
作者
Woltersdorf, L. [1 ,3 ]
Zimmermann, M. [1 ]
Deffner, J. [1 ]
Gerlach, M. [2 ]
Liehr, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] ISOE Inst Social Ecol Res, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Bilfinger Water Technol GmbH, Global Business Unit, Vacuum Technol, Kinzigheimer Weg 104-106, D-63450 Hanau, Germany
[3] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Phys Geog, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Resource recovery; Water reuse; Nutrient reuse; Sustainability; AHP; Multi criteria decision analysis; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS; WASTE-WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban areas of developing countries face the challenge to implement adequate water and sanitation infrastructures while using natural and financial resources sustainably. The objective of this study was to identify benefits and challenges of different nutrient and water reuse systems. For this, we evaluated and compared four systems; (1a) the local conventional water and sanitation system, (2a) a novel water and nutrient reuse system connecting sanitation, advanced wastewater treatment and nutrient rich water reuse for the irrigation of human food crops, (1b) the local conventional water and sanitation system adapted for water reuse and (2b) the novel water and nutrient reuse system adapted to be low tech. Our case study, a town in Namibia, exemplifies the typical problems of urban areas in developing countries. We compared the four systems using ecological, economic, societal, institutional, political, and technical criteria, via multi-decision criteria analysis with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Our results indicate that the novel water and nutrient reuse system (2a) scores highest with environmental and societal criteria when weighting all evaluation criteria equally. Its challenges lay especially in the economic criteria. Nonetheless, for our case study, an urban area in a developing country, the novel water and nutrient reuse system (2a) is a viable sanitation, wastewater and irrigation infrastructure for using fewer resources, being economically feasible, institutionally and politically practical and technically sound. However, the preference for a particular water and sanitation infrastructure also depends on which criteria the decision-maker is willing to assign the highest weight to. The presented methodology helps decision-makers and engineers with complex decision-making by evaluating numerous criteria in order to have proper information on the benefits and challenges of water and sanitation systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 393
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Treated wastewater reuse in South Africa: Overview, potential and challenges [J].
Adewumi, J. R. ;
Ilemobade, A. A. ;
Van Zyl, J. E. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 55 (02) :221-231
[2]  
[Anonymous], SUST CRIT WAT RES SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL REPORT URBAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTEGRATED WAT UNPUB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GUIDELINES SAFE USE, VII:, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014
[6]  
[Anonymous], HOUSEHOLD INVENTORY
[7]  
[Anonymous], MILL CHALL ACC NAM
[8]  
Aydiner C., 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V2015, P1
[9]  
Ayers R. S., 1985, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[10]  
Balkema A.J., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P153