Emojis as Social Information in Digital Communication

被引:38
作者
Erle, Thorsten M. [1 ]
Schmid, Karoline [2 ]
Goslar, Simon H. [1 ]
Martin, Jared D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Julius Maximilians Univ Wurzburg, Dept Social & Gen Psychol, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] OptumLabs, Minnetonka, MN USA
关键词
emojis; facial expressions; digital communication; nonverbal communication; emotion; EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIONS; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; ANGER; EMOTICONS; BEHAVIOR; ONLINE; POWER; SHAPE; ANGRY;
D O I
10.1037/emo0000992
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Facial expressions of emotion are nonverbal cues that evoke affective, inferential, and social responses during face-to-face communication. Given that communication is moving more and more from face-to-face to digital contexts, the present research tested the functional equivalence of their digital counterparts-emojis. Eleven high-powered experiments tested the general effectiveness of emojis to convey emotionality and to disambiguate discourse during digital communication, as well as predictions about their social-emotional properties derived from the Emotion as Social Information (EASI) model. Compared to messages without emojis, those including emojis were perceived as emotionally more intense and as of more extreme valence. Furthermore, the effects of emojis on perceived valence were mediated via perceived emotional intensity. This suggests that emojis are effective quasi-nonverbal cues for digital communication. Furthermore, in line with predictions of the EASI model, emojis produced patterns similar to what has been observed for facial expressions of emotion in face-to-face communication, supporting their functional equivalence. Specifically, they instigated affective (emotion contagion) and inferential (understanding) processes, which subsequently resulted in behavioral intentions (empathic concern). In terms of the predicted mediating processes, we found differences between emojis and offline facial expressions of emotion. These deviations from our predictions are attributed to inherent differences between digital and face-to-face communication and limitations in the employed methodology. In light of the present findings, we discuss a theoretical synthesis of emojis in digital communication with the EASI model and propose a research agenda to connect emotion research with predominant forms of modern communication.
引用
收藏
页码:1529 / 1543
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior [J].
Barsade, SG .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (04) :644-675
[2]   Why does affect matter in organizations? [J].
Barsade, Sigal G. ;
Gibson, Donald E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) :36-59
[3]  
Batson C.D., 2002, ALTRUISM ALTRUISTIC, P89, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195143584.003.0010
[4]   Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel [J].
Batson, CD ;
Early, S ;
Salvarani, G .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1997, 23 (07) :751-758
[6]  
Chang S., 2016, P 10 INT C WEB SOC M, P259, DOI [DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V10I1.14757, 10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14757Number:1]
[7]   Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence [J].
Crivelli, Carlos ;
Fridlund, Alan J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (05) :388-399
[8]   To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising [J].
Das, Gopal ;
Wiener, Hillary J. D. ;
Kareklas, Ioannis .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 96 :147-156
[9]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126
[10]   Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context [J].
Derks, Daantje ;
Bos, Arjan E. R. ;
Von Grumbkow, Jasper .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 11 (01) :99-101