Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study

被引：19
|
作者：
Innocenti, Tiziano [1 ,2 ,12 ]
Feller, Daniel [3 ]
Giagio, Silvia [4 ,5 ]
Salvioli, Stefano [2 ,6 ]
Minnucci, Silvia [7 ]
Brindisino, Fabrizio [7 ,8 ]
Cosentino, Carola [6 ]
Piano, Leonardo [9 ]
Chiarotto, Alessandro [1 ,10 ]
Ostelo, Raymond [1 ,11 ]
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Fac Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] GIMBE Fdn, Bologna, Italy
[3] Prov Agcy Hlth Autonomous Prov Trento, Trento, Italy
[4] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Bologna, Div Occupat Med, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[6] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[7] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Clin Sci & Translat Med, Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy
[9] Fdn Santi Lorenzo & Teobaldo, Unit Rehabil & Funct Recovery, Rodello, Italy
[10] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[11] Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[12] De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词：
Meta-research; Randomised controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Reporting guidelines; Research quality; Risk of bias; REPORTING QUALITY; METAANALYSES; GUIDELINES; TRIALS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100450
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses are essential resources for the clini-cians. They allow to evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of the evidence to support clini-cal decision-making if they are adequately reported. Little is known in the rehabilitation field about the completeness of reporting of SRs and its relationship with the risk of bias (ROB). Objectives: Primary: 1) To evaluate the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews (SRs) published in rehabilitation journals by evaluating their adherence to the PRISMA 2009 checklist, 2) To investigate the relationship between ROB and completeness of reporting. Secondary: To study the association between completeness of reporting and journals and study characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数：9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta-epidemiological study
    Detweiler, B. N.
    Kollmorgen, L. E.
    Umberham, B. A.
    Hedin, R. J.
    Vassar, B. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (08) : 955 - 968
  • [2] Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study
    Sargeant, Jan M.
    Reynolds, Kristen
    Winder, Charlotte B.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 195
  • [3] CONSORT statement adherence and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on deep caries management: a meta-research
    Elagami, Rokaia Ahmed
    Reis, Thais Marchezini
    Hassan, Mohamed Ahmed
    Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
    Braga, Mariana Minatel
    Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
    Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
    Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [4] Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study
    Onishi, Akira
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (12) : 1320 - 1326
  • [5] NEgatiVE results in Radiomics research (NEVER): A meta-research study of publication bias in leading radiology journals
    Kocak, Burak
    Bulut, Elif
    Bayrak, Osman Nuri
    Okumus, Ahmet Arda
    Altun, Omer
    Arvas, Zeynep Borekci
    Kavukoglu, Irem
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 163
  • [6] Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta- research Study
    Innocenti, Tiziano
    Giagio, Silvia
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Feller, Daniel
    Minnucci, Silvia
    Brindisino, Fabrizio
    Ijzelenberg, Wilhelmina
    Ostelo, Raymond
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (09): : 1839 - 1847
  • [7] The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals
    Diane Rosen
    Nils L. Reiter
    Barbara Vogel
    Robert Prill
    Systematic Reviews, 13
  • [8] The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals
    Rosen, Diane
    Reiter, Nils L.
    Vogel, Barbara
    Prill, Robert
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [9] Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
    Van Thu Nguyen
    Engleton, Mishelle
    Davison, Mauricia
    Ravaud, Philippe
    Porcher, Raphael
    Boutron, Isabelle
    BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [10] A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta-research study of research waste
    Lunny, Carole
    Reid, Emma K.
    Neelakant, Trish
    Chen, Alyssa
    Zhang, Jia He
    Shinger, Gavindeep
    Stevens, Adrienne
    Tasnim, Sara
    Sadeghipouya, Shadi
    Adams, Stephen
    Zheng, Yi Wen
    Lin, Lester
    Yang, Pei Hsuan
    Dosanjh, Manpreet
    Ngsee, Peter
    Ellis, Ursula
    Shea, Beverley J.
    Wright, James M.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2022, 13 (03) : 315 - 329
123