Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass

被引:3
作者
Huwidi, Ali [1 ,5 ]
Abobrege, Afaf [1 ]
Assidi, Mourad [2 ,3 ]
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset [2 ]
Ermiah, Eramah [4 ]
机构
[1] Misurata Univ, Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynaecol, Misurata 051, Libya
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Genom Med Res, Mecca 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Med Lab Dept, Mecca 21589, Saudi Arabia
[4] Natl Canc Inst, Med Res Unit, Misurata 051, Libya
[5] Misurata Univ, Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynaecol, Tripoli St, Misurata 051, Libya
关键词
ovarian mass; risk of malignancy index; diagnosis; CANCER ANTIGEN 125; RMI;
D O I
10.3892/mco.2022.2551
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the present study, the Risk Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated based on menopausal status, ultrasound (US) findings and serum biological cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as a scoring system in Libyan females with ovarian masses (OMs) to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. A total of 51 females with OMs referred to the Gynaecology Department of the National Cancer Institute in Misurata (Libya) between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnostic testing. Clinicopathological and demographic data were obtained from patient records. A cut-off point of RMI=200 was used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range, 19-90 years) and 60% of the patients were premenopausal. Examination of the four RMI indices and disease status indicated that the association with the US score (P<0.0001) and with CA-125 (P=0.017) was highly significant. However, the age at diagnosis and menopausal status did not have any significant association with the disease status. The RMI with a cut-off point of 200 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5 and 90.7%, respectively, and a positive and negative predictive value of 63.6 and 97.5%, respectively. The association between the RMI and disease status was highly significant (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the RMI appears to be a reliable, simple and cost-effective tool for clinical differentiation between benign and malignant OMs. This may help to improve the optimal diagnosis and planning of an individualized treatment strategy. However, given the small sample size of the cohort, further validation using larger cohorts in other settings is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125), Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as Diagnostic Tests in Ovarian Cancer [J].
Bouzari, Zinatossadat ;
Rahimi, Hadiseh ;
Gholinia, Hemmat ;
Yazdani, Shahla ;
Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah ;
Soleimani, Mohammad Jafar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (01)
[42]   A comparative study of the risk of malignancy index and the ovarian crescent sign for the diagnosis of invasive ovarian cancer [J].
Yazbek, J. ;
Aslam, N. ;
Tailor, A. ;
Hillaby, K. ;
Raju, K. S. ;
Jurkovic, D. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 28 (03) :320-324
[43]   Use of risk of malignancy index to indicate frozen section analysis in the surgical care of women with ovarian tumors [J].
van den Akker, Petronella A. J. ;
Zusterzeel, Petra L. M. ;
Aalders, Anette L. ;
Snijders, Marc P. L. M. ;
Samlal, Rahul A. K. ;
Vollebergh, Jos H. A. ;
Kluivers, Kirsten B. ;
Massuger, Leon F. A. G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (03) :355-358
[44]   The Risk of Malignancy Index for Ovarian Tumours in Northeast Scotland - a Population Based Study [J].
Harry, V. N. ;
Narayansingh, G. V. ;
Parkin, D. E. .
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 54 (02) :21-23
[45]   Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index [J].
Enakpene, Christopher A. ;
Omigbodun, Akinyinka O. ;
Goecke, Tamme W. ;
Odukogbe, Akin-Tunde ;
Beckmann, Mathias W. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (01) :131-138
[46]   Risk of malignancy index is not sensitive in detecting non-epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumor [J].
Meray, Onur ;
Turkcuoglu, Ilgin ;
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu ;
Kafkasli, Ayse .
JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (01) :22-26
[47]   Predictors of ovarian malignancy in children: Overcoming clinical barriers of ovarian preservation [J].
Papic, Jonathan C. ;
Finnell, S. Maria E. ;
Slaven, James E. ;
Billmire, Deborah F. ;
Rescorla, Frederick J. ;
Leys, Charles M. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 49 (01) :144-148
[48]   The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? [J].
Montagnana, Martina ;
Danese, Elisa ;
Ruzzenente, Orazio ;
Bresciani, Valentina ;
Nuzzo, Teresita ;
Gelati, Matteo ;
Salvagno, Gian Luca ;
Franchi, Massimo ;
Lippi, Giuseppe ;
Guidi, Gian Cesare .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 (03) :521-525
[49]   Clinical utility of the risk of malignancy indices for preoperative differentiation between ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumor [J].
Ra, Oh So ;
Woo, Park Jung ;
Myoungseok, Han ;
Woon, Bae Jong ;
Jean, Cho Yeon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 :27-27
[50]   Clinical value of human epididymis protein 4 and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in differentiating borderline pelvic tumors from epithelial ovarian cancer in early stages [J].
Kotowicz, Beata ;
Fuksiewicz, Malgorzata ;
Sobiczewski, Piotr ;
Spiewankiewicz, Beata ;
Jonska-Gmyrek, Joanna ;
Skrzypczak, Maciej ;
Kowalska, Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 194 :141-146