Diagnostic value of risk of malignancy index in the clinical evaluation of ovarian mass

被引:3
作者
Huwidi, Ali [1 ,5 ]
Abobrege, Afaf [1 ]
Assidi, Mourad [2 ,3 ]
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset [2 ]
Ermiah, Eramah [4 ]
机构
[1] Misurata Univ, Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynaecol, Misurata 051, Libya
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Genom Med Res, Mecca 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Med Lab Dept, Mecca 21589, Saudi Arabia
[4] Natl Canc Inst, Med Res Unit, Misurata 051, Libya
[5] Misurata Univ, Natl Canc Inst, Dept Gynaecol, Tripoli St, Misurata 051, Libya
关键词
ovarian mass; risk of malignancy index; diagnosis; CANCER ANTIGEN 125; RMI;
D O I
10.3892/mco.2022.2551
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the present study, the Risk Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated based on menopausal status, ultrasound (US) findings and serum biological cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as a scoring system in Libyan females with ovarian masses (OMs) to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. A total of 51 females with OMs referred to the Gynaecology Department of the National Cancer Institute in Misurata (Libya) between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnostic testing. Clinicopathological and demographic data were obtained from patient records. A cut-off point of RMI=200 was used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range, 19-90 years) and 60% of the patients were premenopausal. Examination of the four RMI indices and disease status indicated that the association with the US score (P<0.0001) and with CA-125 (P=0.017) was highly significant. However, the age at diagnosis and menopausal status did not have any significant association with the disease status. The RMI with a cut-off point of 200 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5 and 90.7%, respectively, and a positive and negative predictive value of 63.6 and 97.5%, respectively. The association between the RMI and disease status was highly significant (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the RMI appears to be a reliable, simple and cost-effective tool for clinical differentiation between benign and malignant OMs. This may help to improve the optimal diagnosis and planning of an individualized treatment strategy. However, given the small sample size of the cohort, further validation using larger cohorts in other settings is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Role of a Risk of Malignancy Index in Clinical Approaches to Adnexal Masses [J].
Simsek, Hakki Sencer ;
Tokmak, Aytekin ;
Ozgu, Emre ;
Doganay, Melike ;
Danisman, Nuri ;
Erkaya, Salim ;
Gungor, Tayfun .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (18) :7793-7797
[22]   Is the Risk of Malignancy Index a predictive tool for preoperative differentiation between borderline ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer? [J].
Oh, S. R. ;
Park, J-W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) :368-374
[23]   Evaluation of Human Epididymis Protein 4, Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm, and Risk of Malignancy Index Efficiency for Ameliorating Sensitivity and Specificity for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses [J].
Chawla, Sonia ;
Goyal, Gitanjali ;
Grover, Seema ;
Nibhoria, Sarita ;
Kaur, Jaswant .
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY PHYSICIANS, 2023,
[24]   An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass [J].
Wang Li-ming ;
Song Hao ;
Song Xiao ;
Zhou Xiao-bin .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (03) :533-535
[25]   A multicenter clinical trial validating the performance of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and risk of malignancy index [J].
Lycke, Maria ;
Kristjansdottir, Bjorg ;
Sundfeldt, Karin .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (01) :159-165
[26]   Accuracy of the risk of malignancy index-I in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in menopausal women [J].
Radwan, Ahmed M. ;
Taema, Mohamed Ibrahim .
MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2023, 22 (01) :1-5
[27]   Increasing the Effectiveness of Referral of Ovarian Masses From Cancer Unit to Cancer Center by Using a Higher Referral Value of the Risk of Malignancy Index [J].
Raza, Amer ;
Mould, Tim ;
Wilson, Meg ;
Burnell, Mike ;
Bernhardt, Les .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (04) :552-554
[28]   Diagnostic extended usefulness of RMI: comparison of four risk of malignancy index in preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and benign ovarian tumors [J].
Zhang, Shuang ;
Yu, Shan ;
Hou, Wenying ;
Li, Xiaoying ;
Ning, Chunping ;
Wu, Yingnan ;
Zhang, Feng ;
Jiao, Yu Fei ;
Lee, Leo Tsz On ;
Sun, Litao .
JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01)
[29]   Diagnostic extended usefulness of RMI: comparison of four risk of malignancy index in preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and benign ovarian tumors [J].
Shuang Zhang ;
Shan Yu ;
Wenying Hou ;
Xiaoying Li ;
Chunping Ning ;
Yingnan Wu ;
Feng Zhang ;
Yu Fei Jiao ;
Leo Tsz On Lee ;
Litao Sun .
Journal of Ovarian Research, 12
[30]   Identification of Effective Model for Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy Risk using Models like Risk of Malignancy Index, Logistic Regression, International Ovarian Tumour Analysis- Simple Rules [J].
Ramya, S. R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (04) :QC1-QC5