EVALUATION OF QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAMS

被引:2
作者
Eiduks, Janis [1 ]
Paura, Liga [1 ]
Arhipova, Irina [1 ]
机构
[1] Latvia Univ Agr, Fac Informat Technol, Jelgava, Latvia
来源
16TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT | 2017年
关键词
higher education; inputs; outputs; performance indicators; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.22616/ERDev2017.16.N120
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Latvia Higher Education Institutions have offered a large number of the study programs. There is often the question about the quality and efficiency of the study programs and their evaluation possibilities. The quality and efficiency of the study program is often associated with the usefulness of financial and technical resources as well as graduate students grades and labour market opportunities for students. Analysis of the study program quality was carried out using the Latvia University of Agriculture engineering science faculties two study period performance indicators. There are different criteria for the evaluation of the study programs, therefore, manual calculations in each case of the selected criteria are quite complex. As a result, software prototype requirements for the study program quality evaluation system were created. One of the directions of the further research is to develop software that performs automatic calculations of the quality and efficiency of the study programs.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 605
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Al-Bagoury S., 2013, WYNO ACAD J ED RES E, V1, P39
[2]  
Arhipova I., 2014, EC MANAGEMENT, V109, P24
[3]   Quality Culture in the Romanian Higher Education [J].
Barbulescu, Adina .
Proceedings of 6th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2015, 191 :1923-1927
[4]  
Cunha M., 2012, FEP WORKING PAPERS, V468
[5]  
Duan S. X., 2016, J EC ED REV, V22, P89
[6]  
Harvey L., 1996, Transforming higher education
[7]   Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis [J].
Johnes, Jill ;
Yu, Li .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (04) :679-696
[8]  
Kosor M.M., 2013, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, V106, P1031, DOI [10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.117, DOI 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.12.117]
[9]   The past, present, and future of software architecture [J].
Kruchten, P ;
Obbink, H ;
Stafford, J .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2006, 23 (02) :22-30
[10]  
Mandl U., 2008, The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending