Spirometry reference values after inhalation of 200 μg of Salbutamol

被引:24
|
作者
Perez-Padilla, Rogelio
Torre Bouscoulet, Luis
Carlos Vazquez-Garcia, Juan
Muino, Adriana
Marquez, Maria
Victorina Lopez, Maria
de Oca, Maria Montes
Talamo, Carlos
Valdivia, Gonzalo
Pertuze, Julio
Jardim, Jose
Menezes, Ana Maria B.
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Enfermedades Resp, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Republica, Fac Med, Montevideo, Uruguay
[3] Cent Univ Venezuela, Hosp Univ Caracas, Div Pulm, Caracas, Venezuela
[4] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
来源
ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA | 2007年 / 43卷 / 10期
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); bronchodilator response; reference values; spirometry; cross-sectional study; Latin America; PLATINO;
D O I
10.1157/13110877
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The criteria for disease severity established by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease are based on forced expiratory volume in I second (FEV) expressed as a percentage of the predicted value after application of a bronchodilator. This study aims to determine postbronchodilator spirometry reference values. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cluster sample of subjects aged 40 years or over was chosen to be representative of the metropolitan areas of 5 Latin American cities (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Montevideo, Santiago, and Caracas). Spirometry was performed on 5183 subjects following the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society before and after inhalation of 200 mu g of salbutamol. Multiple linear regression equations were fitted for the postbronchodilator spirometric values-FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV6), peak expiratory flow rate, forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FEV6, FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75). These were adjusted for sex, age, and height in 887 asymptomatic subjects with no history of lung disease. RESULTS: The postbronchodilator reference values for FEV, FEV1/FVC, and FEV1/FEV6 were on average 3% higher than those obtained before bronchodilation. This apparently small difference caused an upward shift in the 5th percentile (lower limit of normal) of the predicted values. When prebronchodilation instead of postbronchodilation reference values were used, 3.2% of the results for airflow obstruction in our population of over-40-year-olds were false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: The reported reference values are more appropriate for postbronchodilator spirometry and make it possible to reduce the number of misclassifications.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 534
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New reference values for spirometry in lung function tests. Possible effects on assessment of occupational diseases
    Raab, W.
    TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2015, 17 (04) : 211 - 214
  • [32] Restrictive spirometry versus restrictive lung function using the GLI reference values
    Myrberg, Tomi
    Lindberg, Anne
    Eriksson, Berne
    Hedman, Linnea
    Stridsman, Caroline
    Lundback, Bo
    Ronmark, Eva
    Backman, Helena
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 42 (03) : 181 - 189
  • [33] Impact of Using Pre- and Postbronchodilator Spirometry Reference Values in a Chinese Population
    Huang, Ke
    Han, Xueyan
    Pan, Zhaoyang
    Xu, Jianying
    Zhao, Jianping
    Zhang, Xiangyan
    Song, Yuanlin
    Kang, Jian
    Ran, Pixin
    Zhou, Yumin
    Shen, Huahao
    Wen, Fuqiang
    Huang, Kewu
    Chen, Yahong
    Guo, Yanfei
    Shan, Guangliang
    Wu, Sinan
    Guan, Tianjia
    Yang, Ting
    Wang, Chen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 210 (07) : 881 - 889
  • [34] Global lung function initiative 2012 reference values for spirometry in Asian Americans
    Jingzhou Zhang
    Xiao Hu
    Xinlun Tian
    Kai-Feng Xu
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 18
  • [35] Global lung function initiative 2012 reference values for spirometry in Asian Americans
    Zhang, Jingzhou
    Hu, Xiao
    Tian, Xinlun
    Xu, Kai-Feng
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2018, 18
  • [36] Evaluation of the Global Lung function Initiative reference values for spirometry and diffusion capacity
    De Soomer, Kevin
    Casas, Lidia
    Vaerenberg, Hilde
    Oostveen, Ellie
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [37] The Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference values reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry
    Hall, Graham L.
    Thompson, Bruce R.
    Stanojevic, Sanja
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Beasley, Richard
    Coates, Andrew
    Dent, Annette
    Eckert, Brenton
    James, Alan
    Filsell, Sue
    Musk, A. W.
    Nolan, Gary
    Dixon, Barbara
    O'Dea, Chris
    Savage, Jenni
    Stocks, Janet
    Swanney, Maureen P.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2012, 17 (07) : 1150 - 1151
  • [38] Compatibility of the global lung function 2012 spirometry reference values in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review
    Santos, Bruna Weber
    Scalco, Janaina Cristina
    Parazzi, Paloma Lopes Francisco
    Schivinski, Camila Isabel Santos
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 18 (11) : 883 - 892
  • [39] Reference values for spirometry, including vital capacity, in Japanese adults calculated with the LMS method and compared with previous values
    Kubota, Masaru
    Kobayashi, Hirosuke
    Quanjer, Philip H.
    Omori, Hisamitsu
    Tatsumi, Koichiro
    Kanazawa, Minoru
    RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 52 (04) : 242 - 250
  • [40] Spirometry reference values for American Indian adults - Results from the Strong Heart Study
    Marion, MS
    Leonardson, GR
    Rhoades, ER
    Welty, TK
    Enright, PL
    CHEST, 2001, 120 (02) : 489 - 495