Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

被引:7
作者
Aziz, Hassan [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad [2 ]
Khan, Sara [3 ]
Serra, Guillermo P.
Goodman, Martin D. [1 ,4 ]
Genyk, Yuri [5 ]
Sheikh, Mohd. Raashid [5 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Valhalla, NY USA
[3] St Davids Hlth Care Syst, Dept Surg, Austin, TX USA
[4] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Open pancreaticoduodenectomy; National Cancer Database; LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-021-01296-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 694
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients
    Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir
    Choudhury, Kingshuk
    Dinan, Michaela A.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Scheri, Randall P.
    Blazer, Dan G., III
    Roman, Sanziana A.
    Sosa, Julie A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 372 - 377
  • [2] The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Moekotte, Alma L.
    Vissers, Frederique L.
    Kunzler, Filipe
    Cipriani, Federica
    Alseidi, Adnan
    D'Angelica, Michael I.
    Balduzzi, Alberto
    Bassi, Claudio
    Bjornsson, Bergthor
    Boggi, Ugo
    Callery, Mark P.
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Coimbra, Felipe J.
    Conrad, Claudius
    Cook, Andrew
    Coppola, Alessandro
    Dervenis, Christos
    Dokmak, Safi
    Edil, Barish H.
    Edwin, Bjorn
    Giulianotti, Pier C.
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Hansen, Paul D.
    van der Heijde, Nicky
    van Hilst, Jony
    Hester, Caitlin A.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Jarufe, Nicolas
    Jeyarajah, D. Rohan
    Keck, Tobias
    Kim, Song Cheol
    Khatkov, Igor E.
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Kooby, David A.
    Korrel, Maarten
    de Leon, Francisco J.
    Lluis, Nuria
    Lof, Sanne
    Machado, Marcel A.
    Demartines, Nicolas
    Martinie, John B.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    Molenaar, I. Quintus
    Moravek, Cassadie
    Mou, Yi-Ping
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    Nealon, William H.
    Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
    Pessaux, Patrick
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [3] Comprehensive analysis of laparoscopic, robotic, and open hepatectomy outcomes using the nationwide readmissions database
    Aziz, Hassan
    Wang, Johnny C.
    Genyk, Yuri
    Sheikh, Mohd Raashid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 401 - 407
  • [4] Hospitalization Costs and Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Liver Resections
    Aziz, Hassan
    Hanna, Kamil
    Lashkari, Nassim
    Ahmad, Noor-Us-Sabah
    Genyk, Yuri
    Sheikh, Mohd Raashid
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (09) : 2331 - 2337
  • [5] Aziz H, 2020, AM SURGEON, V86, P341
  • [6] Aziz H, 2018, J PANCREAS, V19, P291
  • [7] Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond
    Baker, Erin H.
    Ross, Samuel W.
    Seshadri, Ramanathan
    Swan, Ryan Z.
    Iannitti, David A.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Martinie, John B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (04) : 396 - 405
  • [8] Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review
    Chan, Kai Siang
    Wang, Zhong Kai
    Syn, Nicholas
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2021, 170 (01) : 194 - 206
  • [9] Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study
    Chen, Shi
    Chen, Jiang-Zhi
    Zhan, Qian
    Deng, Xia-Xing
    Shen, Bai-Yong
    Peng, Cheng-Hong
    Li, Hong-Wei
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3698 - 3711
  • [10] RETRACTED: A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction (Retracted article. See vol. 46, pg. 631, 2016)
    Cho, Akihiro
    Yamamoto, Hiroshi
    Nagata, Matsuo
    Takiguchi, Nobuhiro
    Shimada, Hideaki
    Kainuma, Osamu
    Souda, Hiroaki
    Gunji, Hisashi
    Miyazaki, Akinari
    Ikeda, Atsushi
    Tohma, Tomoko
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2009, 39 (04) : 359 - 362