Comparison of xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel and Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus for Detecting Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus

被引:14
作者
Hwang, Sang Mee [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Mi Suk [1 ]
Han, Minsuk [1 ]
Hong, Yun Ji [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Taek Soo [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Hye Ryun [3 ]
Song, Eun Young [2 ]
Park, Kyoung Un [1 ,2 ]
Song, Junghan [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Eui Chong [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Songnam 463707, Gyeonggido, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gyeongsang Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Jinju, South Korea
关键词
liquid bead array; solid microarray; xTAG RVP; Verigene RV; respiratory syncytial viruses; influenza A virus; influenza B virus; ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTS; VIRAL PANEL; FAST ASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; PERFORMANCE; INFECTIONS; PCR;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.21738
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundNucleic acid amplification tests have allowed simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses. MethodsWe compared the results of a liquid bead array xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP; (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and a solid microarray Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus (RV+; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) for the detection of influenza A virus (INF A), influenza B virus (INF B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in 170 respiratory specimens from hospitalized patients. ResultsOverall, xTAG RVP demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 97.6 and 100% for INF A, 100 and 99.4% for INF B, and 100 and 100% for RSV, while the Verigene RV+ test sensitivities and specificities were 95.1 and 98.5%, 100.0 and 99.4%, and 97.1 and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the area under the curves between the two assays for each virus (P = 0.364 for INF A, P = 1.000 for INF B, P = 0.317 for RSV). Comparing the results of two assays, discordant results were present mostly due to subtype assignments and identification of coinfections. The detection of viruses was not significantly different (P = 1.000) and the virus/subtype assignment showed good agreement with kappa coefficients of 0.908. ConclusionThe xTAG RVP and Verigene RV+ showed high sensitivities and specificities, and good overall agreement in detection and identification of INF and RSV. These assays can be used in clinical settings for a reliable detection of respiratory viruses found commonly in hospitalized patients.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Comparative Evaluation of the Nanosphere Verigene RV plus Assay and the Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV Kit for Detection of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
    Alby, Kevin
    Popowitch, Elena B.
    Miller, Melissa B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (01) : 352 - 353
  • [2] Comparison of the Luminex xTAG RVP Fast Assay and the Idaho Technology FilmArray RP Assay for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Pediatric Patients at a Cancer Hospital
    Babady, N. Esther
    Mead, Peter
    Stiles, Jeffrey
    Brennan, Carrie
    Li, Haijing
    Shuptar, Susan
    Stratton, Charles W.
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    Kamboj, Mini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (07) : 2282 - 2288
  • [3] Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study
    Barenfanger, J
    Drake, C
    Leon, N
    Mueller, T
    Troutt, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (08) : 2824 - 2828
  • [4] Relative Impact of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Children
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    Valim, Clarissa
    McAdam, Alexander J.
    Mandl, Kenneth D.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (06) : E1072 - E1080
  • [5] Comparison of three multiplex PCR assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections: evaluation of xTAG respiratory virus panel fast assay, RespiFinder 19 assay and RespiFinder SMART 22 assay
    Dabisch-Ruthe, Mareike
    Vollmer, Tanja
    Adams, Ortwin
    Knabbe, Cornelius
    Dreier, Jens
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12
  • [6] Nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of respiratory viruses
    Fox, Julie D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2007, 40 : S15 - S23
  • [7] Comparison of the Luminex Respiratory Virus Panel Fast Assay with In-House Real-Time PCR for Respiratory Viral Infection Diagnosis
    Gadsby, Naomi J.
    Hardie, Alison
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    Templeton, Kate E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (06) : 2213 - 2216
  • [8] Evaluation of multiple commercial molecular and conventional diagnostic assays for the detection of respiratory viruses in children
    Gharabaghi, F.
    Hawan, A.
    Drews, S. J.
    Richardson, S. E.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (12) : 1900 - 1906
  • [9] Detection of respiratory viruses using non-molecular based methods
    Ginocchio, Christine C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2007, 40 : S11 - S14
  • [10] Strengths and Weaknesses of FDA-Approved/Cleared Diagnostic Devices for the Molecular Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
    Ginocchio, Christine C.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 : S312 - S325