Preparation, properties and the effects of amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin in free and liposomal formulations on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria

被引:25
|
作者
Omri, A
Ravaoarinoro, M
机构
[1] HOP HOTEL DIEU,DEPT MICROBIOL & INFECTIOL,MONTREAL,PQ H2W 1T8,CANADA
[2] UNIV MONTREAL,DEPT PHARMACOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3C 3J7,CANADA
[3] UNIV MONTREAL,DEPT MICROBIOL & IMMUNOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3C 3J7,CANADA
关键词
liposomes; aminoglycosides; bacteria; SMALL UNILAMELLAR LIPOSOMES; AMINOGLYCOSIDE NEPHROTOXICITY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; INVITRO; SERUM; RESISTANCE; INFECTIONS; GENTAMICIN; AGENTS; INVIVO;
D O I
10.1016/0924-8579(96)00003-9
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The most common problems limiting the medical use of aminoglycosides have been the nephro- and oto-toxicities and the increasing bacterial resistance. It has been shown that encapsulation of drugs into liposomes enhances their efficacy while reducing their toxicities. The present in vitro study was designed to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of free and liposomal amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin. We, therefore, encapsulated these drugs into liposomes prepared by sonication. The drug contained in liposomes was measured by enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) after lysis of the vesicles by 0.2% Triton X-100. The comparative encapsulation efficiency of the three antibiotic preparations was assessed. Aminoglycosides kinetic release from liposomes in presence of normal human sera was also studied in vitro over a 48 h period at 37 degrees C under 5% CO2. The MICs of these encapsulated drugs to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Xanthomonas maltophilia, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus were determined and compared to those of respective free drugs using an agar dilution method. The amikacin and tobramycin encapsulation efficiencies were significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) higher (5.36% +/- 0.17 and 5.06% +/- 0.10) than those of netilmicin (3% +/- 0.18). However, in presence of sera, liposomal retention of netilmicin was significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) lower (61.88 +/- 0.14%) than that of amikacin (81.45 +/- 0.64%) and tobramycin (94.07 +/- 0.18%) after 1 h of incubation and then remained nearly constant over an 48 h period of the study. The MICs of liposomal netilmicin against all bacterial strains tested were reduced, compared to those of free netilmicin. However, liposomal amikacin and tobramycin MICs were nearly similar to those of free respective drugs. Overall, liposomal netilmicin appears to be a promising approach in the management of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections and should be further evaluated in vivo experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Differential effects of dexmedetomidine on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial killing and phagocytosis
    Maisat, Wiriya
    Han, Xiaohui
    Koutsogiannaki, Sophia
    Soriano, Sulpicio G.
    Yuki, Koichi
    INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 120
  • [42] Prognostic differences in sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Aling
    Shi, Yi
    Dong, Qingqing
    Wang, Sihui
    Ge, Yao
    Wang, Chenyan
    Gong, Zhimin
    Zhang, Weizhen
    Chen, Wei
    CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [43] Effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in Gram-positive and Gram-negative models of ocular inflammation
    Lafreniere, J. Daniel
    Toguri, James T.
    Gupta, Rishi R.
    Samad, Arif
    O'Brien, Dan M.
    Dickinson, John
    Cruess, Alan
    Kelly, Melanie E. M.
    Seamone, Mark E.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 47 (05) : 638 - 645
  • [44] Coriander essential oil and linalool - interactions with antibiotics against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
    Aelenei, P.
    Rimbu, C. M.
    Guguianu, E.
    Dimitriu, G.
    Aprotosoaie, A. C.
    Brebu, M.
    Horhogea, C. E.
    Miron, A.
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 68 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [45] Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles in Polycaprolactone Nanofibers against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Lopez-Esparza, Juan
    Francisco Espinosa-Cristobal, Leon
    Donohue-Cornejo, Alejandro
    Yobanny Reyes-Lopez, Simon
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (49) : 12532 - 12538
  • [46] Comparison of Cd binding mechanisms by gram-positive, gram-negative and consortia of bacteria using XAFS
    Mishra, Bhoopesh
    Fein, Jeremy B.
    Boyanov, Maxim I.
    Kelly, Shelly D.
    Kemner, Kenneth M.
    Bunker, Bruce A.
    X-RAY ABSORPTION FINE STRUCTURE-XAFS13, 2007, 882 : 343 - +
  • [47] Phthalocyanine-sulfonamide conjugates: Synthesis and photodynamic inactivation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
    da Silva, Raquel Nunes
    Cunha, Angela
    Tome, Augusto C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 154 : 60 - 67
  • [48] Distinctive Binding of Avibactam to Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria
    Asli, Abdelhamid
    Brouillette, Eric
    Krause, Kevin M.
    Nichols, Wright W.
    Malouin, Francois
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 60 (02) : 752 - 756
  • [49] Development and Testing of ZnO Nanorods Based Biosensor on Model Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Borgohain, Rashi
    Baruah, Sunandan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (09) : 2649 - 2653
  • [50] Dustborne and airborne Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in high versus low ERMI homes
    Adhikari, Atin
    Kettleson, Eric M.
    Vesper, Stephen
    Kumar, Sudhir
    Popham, David L.
    Schaffer, Christopher
    Indugula, Reshmi
    Chatterjee, Kanistha
    Allam, Karteek K.
    Grinshpun, Sergey A.
    Reponen, Tiina
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 482 : 92 - 99