Assessment of care by breast cancer patients participating or not participating in a Randomized controlled trial:: A report with the patients' committee for clinical trials of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

被引:12
作者
Julian-Reynier, Claire
Geneve, Jean
Dalenc, Florence
Genre, Dominique
Monnier, Alain
Kerbrat, Pierre
Largillier, Remy
Serin, Daniel
Rios, Maria
Roche, Henri
Jimenez, Marta
Tarpin, Carole
Maraninchi, Dominique
机构
[1] Inst Natl Rech Med, Epidemiol & Social Unit, F-13273 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Aix Marseille, Fac Med Sci, Paoli Calmettes Inst, Marseille, France
[3] Fed Natl Ctrs, Lutte Cotnre Cancer, Paris, France
[4] Claudius Regaud Inst, Toulouse, France
[5] Andre Boulloche Ctr, Montbeliard, France
[6] Eugene Marquis Ctr, Rennes, France
[7] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, F-06054 Nice, France
[8] St Catherine Inst Avignon, Avignon, France
[9] Ctr Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9367
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials ( RCTs) have not been found to have better clinical outcomes than other patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of RCTs on patients' satisfaction with care. Patients and Methods A prospective study was carried out in a cohort of women with breast cancer ( N = 455) divided into those invited to participate in an RCT ( 201 acceptances, 66 refusals) and a comparable control group not invited to participate ( n = 188). All the patients underwent the same treatment ( fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) for six cycles). One and 7 months after the beginning of chemotherapy, self-administered satisfaction scores were used to compare the women's assessment of their care ( Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care validated scale). Results At the beginning of chemotherapy, women to whom RCT had been proposed rated the doctors' availability ( average +/- standard deviation [ SD]: RCT acceptance group, 3.60 +\- 0.78; RCT refusal group, 3.68 +\- 0.87; control group, 3.41 +\- 0.82; P <= .02) and the doctors' communication ( average +\- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.56 +\- 0.88; RCT refusal group, 3.67 +\- 0.88; control group, 3.39 +\- 0.84; P <= .05) higher than those to whom the trial was not proposed. After the treatment, participants in the RCT felt that their doctor was more supportive ( average +\- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.04 +\- 0.92; control group, 2.77 +\- 0.85; P = .005) and more informative about their illness and treatment ( average +\- SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.34 +\- 0.88; control group, 3.08 +\- 0.92; P = .006) than those in the control group. The general level of satisfaction was also higher in the RCT acceptance group. Conclusion Women participating in an RCT have a more positive picture of their doctors' care than others, probably because of the structural effects of the informed consent and data collection processes.
引用
收藏
页码:3038 / 3044
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer:: 10-year follow-up results of The French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial [J].
Bonneterre, J ;
Roché, H ;
Kerbrat, P ;
Brémond, A ;
Fumoleau, P ;
Namer, M ;
Goudier, MJ ;
Schraub, S ;
Fargeot, P ;
Chapelle-Marcillac, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) :2686-2693
[2]   An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) [J].
Brédart, A ;
Bottomley, A ;
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Coens, C ;
D'Haese, S ;
Chie, WC ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Arraras, JI ;
Efficace, F ;
Rodary, C ;
Schraub, S ;
Costantini, M ;
Costantini, A ;
Joly, F ;
Sezer, O ;
Razavi, D ;
Mehlitz, M ;
Bielska-Lasota, M ;
Aaronson, NK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (14) :2120-2131
[3]  
Brédart A, 2005, CURR OPIN ONCOL, V17, P351
[4]   Patients' satisfaction ratings and their desire for care improvement across oncology settings from France, Italy, Poland and Sweden [J].
Brédart, A ;
Robertson, C ;
Razavi, D ;
Batel-Copel, L ;
Larsson, G ;
Lichosik, D ;
Meyza, J ;
Schraub, S ;
Von Essen, L ;
De Haes, JCJM .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (01) :68-77
[5]   A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care:: Preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy [J].
Brédart, A ;
Razavi, D ;
Robertson, C ;
Didier, F ;
Scaffidi, E ;
de Haes, JCJM .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :839-846
[6]   A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care:: preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients [J].
Brédart, A ;
Razavi, D ;
Robertson, C ;
Batel-Copel, L ;
Larsson, G ;
Lichosik, D ;
Meyza, J ;
Schraub, S ;
von Essen, L ;
de Haes, JCJM .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2001, 43 (03) :243-252
[7]  
CARRHILL RA, 1992, J PUBLIC HEALTH MED, V14, P236
[8]  
FUHRER R, 1989, Psychiatrie and Psychobiologie, V4, P163
[9]   Assessing inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care: should we prefer evaluation or satisfaction ratings? [J].
Hendriks, AAJ ;
Vrielink, MR ;
van Es, SQ ;
De Haas, HJCJM ;
Smets, EMA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 55 (01) :142-146
[10]   Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy [J].
Jenkins, V ;
Fallowfield, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 82 (11) :1783-1788