Australian public hospital inpatient satisfaction related to early patient involvement and shared decision-making in discharge planning

被引:10
|
作者
Chia, Yong Yau Paul [1 ,2 ]
Ekladious, Adel [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hobart Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med, 48 Liverpool St, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Bunbury Hosp, Dept Med, Bunbury, WA, Australia
关键词
patient satisfaction; shared decision-making; discharge planning; public hospital; inpatient; CARE; SAFETY; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; CHECKLIST; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/imj.14872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Surveys of hospital inpatient satisfaction may help develop actionable plans for quality improvement, and patients have preferred to give feedback during admission at the point of service compared to after discharge. However, patient satisfaction measurement has often been done by questionnaires post-discharge, and without focussing on an Australian general internal medicine setting. Aims To understand patients' perceptions of their admission experiences in an Australian public teaching hospital's general internal medicine unit, and to understand the opportunities for quality improvement. Methods A prospective study of 50 inpatients of a general internal medicine unit at an Australian public teaching hospital was carried out using a patient satisfaction questionnaire given to patients on the day of discharge. Results Patients perceived deficits in early communication about discharge destination planning, and provision of written discharge instructions. Responses highlighted the importance of checking with patients to elicit further information that was not previously captured during initial history-taking, patient-centred communication to enable informed consent and decision making, use of language readily understandable to laypersons, and checking for patients' understanding of messages as communicated by the treating clinician. Conclusions In an Australian general internal medicine service, early involvement and shared decision-making in discharge planning are valued by patients. Incorporating checking of patients' understanding of diagnoses, management, discharge instructions, and follow-up plans into ward round routines may benefit patient satisfaction. This study stimulates further research into the use of a proforma to capture and check patients' understanding of discharge diagnoses and plans.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 895
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Analyzing the effects of shared decision-making, empathy and team interaction on patient satisfaction and treatment acceptance in medical rehabilitation using a structural equation modeling approach
    Quaschning, Katharina
    Koerner, Mirjam
    Wirtz, Markus
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 91 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [32] Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study
    Renda Soylemez Wiener
    Elisa Koppelman
    Rendelle Bolton
    Karen E. Lasser
    Belinda Borrelli
    David H. Au
    Christopher G. Slatore
    Jack A. Clark
    Hasmeena Kathuria
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1035 - 1042
  • [33] How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies
    Keij, Sascha M.
    de Boer, Joyce E.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    de Bruin, Bruine Wandi
    Peters, Ellen
    Moaddine, Saida
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [34] Effect of standardised surgical assessment and shared decision-making on morbidity and patient satisfaction after breast conserving therapy: A cross-sectional study
    Aristokleous, Iliana
    Oberg, Johanna
    Pantiora, Eirini
    Sjokvist, Olivia
    Navia, Jaime E.
    Mani, Maria
    Karakatsanis, Andreas
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (01): : 60 - 67
  • [35] Patient-centric care in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): shared decision-making and assessment of health-related quality of life
    Maitland, Hillary
    Lambert, Catherine
    Ghanima, Waleed
    HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [36] Accentuating patient values in shared decision-making: A mixed methods development of an online value clarification tool and communication training in the context of early phase clinical cancer trials
    van Gurp, Jelle L. P.
    van Lent, Liza G. G.
    Stoel, Nicole
    van der Rijt, Carin C. D.
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    Hasselaar, Jeroen
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 119
  • [37] Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis
    Warner, Bronwen E.
    Lound, Adam
    Grailey, Kate
    Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
    Wells, Mary
    Brett, Stephen J.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2023, 62
  • [38] Shared decision-making among non-physician healthcare professionals: Enhancing patient involvement in women's reproductive health in community healthcare settings
    Meier, Stephanie
    Kasting, Monica L.
    Liu, Sandra S.
    DeMaria, Andrea L.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (09) : 2304 - 2316
  • [39] Adolescent Cancer and Health-Related Decision-Making: An Australian Multi-Perspective Family Analysis of Appointment Attendance and Involvement in Medical and Lifestyle Choices
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    McLoone, Jordana K.
    Fleming, Catharine A. K.
    Peate, Michelle
    Thomas, Emily J.
    Sansom-Daly, Ursula
    Butow, Phyllis
    Cohn, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2011, 1 (04) : 173 - 180
  • [40] An interactive, online decision aid assessing patient goals and preferences for treatment of aortic stenosis to support physician-led shared decision-making: Early feasibility pilot study
    Coylewright, Megan
    Otero, Diana
    Lindman, Brian R.
    Levack, Melissa M.
    Horne Jr, Aaron
    Ngo, Long H.
    Beaudry, Melissa
    Col, Hannah V.
    Col, Nananda F.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):