Australian public hospital inpatient satisfaction related to early patient involvement and shared decision-making in discharge planning

被引:10
|
作者
Chia, Yong Yau Paul [1 ,2 ]
Ekladious, Adel [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hobart Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med, 48 Liverpool St, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Bunbury Hosp, Dept Med, Bunbury, WA, Australia
关键词
patient satisfaction; shared decision-making; discharge planning; public hospital; inpatient; CARE; SAFETY; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; CHECKLIST; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/imj.14872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Surveys of hospital inpatient satisfaction may help develop actionable plans for quality improvement, and patients have preferred to give feedback during admission at the point of service compared to after discharge. However, patient satisfaction measurement has often been done by questionnaires post-discharge, and without focussing on an Australian general internal medicine setting. Aims To understand patients' perceptions of their admission experiences in an Australian public teaching hospital's general internal medicine unit, and to understand the opportunities for quality improvement. Methods A prospective study of 50 inpatients of a general internal medicine unit at an Australian public teaching hospital was carried out using a patient satisfaction questionnaire given to patients on the day of discharge. Results Patients perceived deficits in early communication about discharge destination planning, and provision of written discharge instructions. Responses highlighted the importance of checking with patients to elicit further information that was not previously captured during initial history-taking, patient-centred communication to enable informed consent and decision making, use of language readily understandable to laypersons, and checking for patients' understanding of messages as communicated by the treating clinician. Conclusions In an Australian general internal medicine service, early involvement and shared decision-making in discharge planning are valued by patients. Incorporating checking of patients' understanding of diagnoses, management, discharge instructions, and follow-up plans into ward round routines may benefit patient satisfaction. This study stimulates further research into the use of a proforma to capture and check patients' understanding of discharge diagnoses and plans.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 895
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] ?Shared decision-making and patient and public involvement: Can they become standard in Switzerland?
    Selby, Kevin
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    von Plessen, Christian
    Auer, Reto
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Krones, Tanja
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Cornuz, Jacques
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 171 : 135 - 138
  • [2] Patient Involvement and Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien
    Perez-Ramos, Jeanette
    Rivero-Santana, Amado
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    CURRENT CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 6 (02): : 83 - 90
  • [3] The Impact of Medical Risk Perception on Patient Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Shared Decision-Making
    Zhou, Kairu
    Chen, Li
    Li, Min
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2024, 17 : 2981 - 2995
  • [4] Nurses' perceptions of patient involvement in shared decision-making in cardiovascular care
    Siouta, Eleni
    Olsson, Ulf
    Waldreus, Nana
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [5] Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?
    Galletta, Maura
    Piazza, Maria Francesca
    Meloni, Stefania Luisa
    Chessa, Elsa
    Piras, Ilenia
    Arnetz, Judith E.
    D'Aloja, Ernesto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [6] Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported involvement in treatment decisions
    Ali-Ahmed, Fatima
    Pieper, Karen
    North, Rebecca
    Allen, Larry A.
    Chan, Paul S.
    Ezekowitz, Michael D.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Freeman, James, V
    Go, Alan S.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Kowey, Peter R.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    Naccarelli, Gerald, V
    Pokorney, Sean D.
    Reiffel, James A.
    Singer, Daniel E.
    Steinberg, Benjamin A.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    O'Brien, Emily C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2020, 6 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [7] Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status
    Joosten, E. A. G.
    DeFuentes-Merillas, L.
    de Weert, G. H.
    Sensky, T.
    van der Staak, C. P. F.
    de Jong, C. A. J.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2008, 77 (04) : 219 - 226
  • [8] Patient experience and satisfaction with shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study among outpatients
    Tian, Cindy Yue
    Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
    Qiu, Hong
    Zhao, Shi
    Wang, Kailu
    Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
    Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 129
  • [9] Shared decision-making in Malaysia: Legislation, patient involvement, implementation and the impact of COVID-19
    Lee, Yew Kong
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Lee, Ping Yein
    Tong, Wen Ting
    Sa'at, Hamizah
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 171 : 89 - 92
  • [10] Shared Decision-Making During Inpatient Rounds: Opportunities for Improvement in Patient Engagement and Communication
    Blankenburg, Rebecca
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Yuan, Patrick
    Rennke, Stephanie
    Monash, Brad
    Harman, Stephanie M.
    Sakai, Debbie S.
    Hosamani, Poonam
    Khan, Adeena
    Chua, Ian
    Huynh, Eric
    Shieh, Lisa
    Xie, Lijia
    Satterfield, Jason M.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (07) : 453 - 461