Safe Vehicle Trajectory Planning in an Autonomous Decision Support Framework for Emergency Situations

被引:11
作者
Xu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Sainct, Remi [1 ,2 ]
Gruyer, Dominique [1 ,2 ]
Orfila, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gustave Eiffel, COSYS PICS L, F-77202 Marne La Vallee, France
[2] 25 Allee Marronniers, F-78000 Versailles, France
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 14期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
emergency situation; Autonomous Decision Support Framework; trajectory planning; virtual Co-Pilot; autonomous driving prototyping; ARTIFICIAL POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS; PATH TRACKING; LOCALIZATION; CONTROLLER; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/app11146373
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
For a decade, researchers have focused on the development and deployment of road automated mobility. In the development of autonomous driving embedded systems, several stages are required. The first one deals with the perception layers. The second one is dedicated to the risk assessment, the decision and strategy layers and the optimal trajectory planning. The last stage addresses the vehicle control/command. This paper proposes an efficient solution to the second stage and improves a virtual Cooperative Pilot (Co-Pilot) already proposed in 2012. This paper thus introduces a trajectory planning algorithm for automated vehicles (AV), specifically designed for emergency situations and based on the Autonomous Decision-Support Framework (ADSF) of the EU project Trustonomy. This algorithm is an extended version of Elastic Band (EB) with no fixed final position. A set of trajectory nodes is iteratively deduced from obstacles and constraints, thus providing flexibility, fast computation, and physical realism. After introducing the project framework for risk management and the general concept of ADSF, the emergency algorithm is presented and tested under Matlab software. Finally, the Decision-Support framework is implemented under RTMaps software and demonstrated within Pro-SiVIC, a realistic 3D simulation environment. Both the previous virtual Co-Pilot and the new emergency algorithm are combined and used in a near-accident situation and shown in different risky scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 80 条
[11]  
Buehler M., 2007, The 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge: The Great Robot Race, V36
[12]   Decision support issues in automated driving systems [J].
Caballero, William N. ;
Rios Insua, David ;
Banks, David .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (03) :1216-1244
[13]  
Caijing X., 2013, AUTOMOT ENG, V35, P808
[14]  
Campos GR, 2014, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2932, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2014.7039840
[15]  
Canny J., 1987, 28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.87CH2471-1), P49, DOI 10.1109/SFCS.1987.42
[16]   A Review of Motion Planning for Highway Autonomous Driving [J].
Claussmann, Laurene ;
Revilloud, Marc ;
Gruyer, Dominique ;
Glaser, Sebastien .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 21 (05) :1826-1848
[17]  
Codevilla F, 2018, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P4693
[18]   Risk-Aversive Behavior Planning under Multiple Situations with Uncertainty [J].
Damerow, Florian ;
Eggert, Julian .
2015 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2015, :656-663
[19]  
Dickmann J., 2016, P 2016 IEEE RAD C RA P IEEE RAD C, P1
[20]  
Dijkstra E.W., 1959, Numer. Math, V50, P269, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01386390, 10.1007/BF01386390]