Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models A Systematic Review of Model Performance

被引:44
|
作者
Smith, Lauren N. [1 ]
Makam, Anil N. [1 ,2 ]
Darden, Douglas [4 ]
Mayo, Helen [3 ]
Das, Sandeep R. [1 ]
Halm, Ethan A. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Oanh Kieu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Hlth Sci Digital Lib & Learning Ctr, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Internal Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2018年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Medicaid; Medicare; myocardial infarction; patient readmission; risk; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HEART-FAILURE; 30-DAY READMISSIONS; DISCHARGE RISK; PNEUMONIA; PATIENT; HEALTH; IMPACT; DEATH;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hospitals are subject to federal financial penalties for excessive 30-day hospital readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prospectively identifying patients hospitalized with AMI at high risk for readmission could help prevent 30-day readmissions by enabling targeted interventions. However, the performance of AMI-specific readmission risk prediction models is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically searched the published literature through March 2017 for studies of risk prediction models for 30-day hospital readmission among adults with AMI. We identified 11 studies of 18 unique risk prediction models across diverse settings primarily in the United States, of which 16 models were specific to AMI. The median overall observed all-cause 30-day readmission rate across studies was 16.3% (range, 10.6%-21.0%). Six models were based on administrative data; 4 on electronic health record data; 3 on clinical hospital data; and 5 on cardiac registry data. Models included 7 to 37 predictors, of which demographics, comorbidities, and utilization metrics were the most frequently included domains. Most models, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services AMI administrative model, had modest discrimination (median C statistic, 0.65; range, 0.53-0.79). Of the 16 reported AMI-specific models, only 8 models were assessed in a validation cohort, limiting generalizability. Observed risk-stratified readmission rates ranged from 3.0% among the lowest-risk individuals to 43.0% among the highest-risk individuals, suggesting good risk stratification across all models. CONCLUSIONS: Current AMI-specific readmission risk prediction models have modest predictive ability and uncertain generalizability given methodological limitations. No existing models provide actionable information in real time to enable early identification and risk-stratification of patients with AMI before hospital discharge, a functionality needed to optimize the potential effectiveness of readmission reduction interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Implications for Public Reporting
    Bruckel, Jeffrey
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Ling, Frederick
    Howell, Erik H.
    Lowenstein, Charles J.
    Thomas, Sabu
    Bradley, Steven M.
    Mehta, Anuj
    Walkey, Allan J.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2019, 12 (03):
  • [22] Safety of coffee consumption after myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ribeiro, Eduardo M.
    Alves, Mariana
    Costa, Joao
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Pinto, Fausto J.
    Caldeira, Daniel
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 30 (12) : 2146 - 2158
  • [23] Readmission Risk Prediction Model for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Jing
    Liu, Ping
    Lei, Mei-Rong
    Zhang, Hong-Wei
    You, Ao-Lin
    Luan, Xiao-Rong
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 51 (07) : 1481 - 1493
  • [24] Prognostic Value of The Leuko-Glycemic Index in Acute Myocardial Infarction; a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis
    Sadeghi, Roxana
    Dizaji, Shayan Roshdi
    Vazirizadeh-Mahabadi, Mohammadhossein
    Sarveazad, Arash
    Forouzannia, Seyed Ali
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [25] Hospital Readmission After Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Noncardiac Surgery
    Smilowitz, Nathaniel R.
    Beckman, Joshua A.
    Sherman, Scott E.
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (22) : 2332 - 2339
  • [26] An Efficient Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Dhilsath F.M.
    Samuel S.J.
    Hariharan R.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2021, 14 (07): : 2360 - 2368
  • [27] Acute Myocardial Infarction and Risk of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Review
    Thong, Elizabeth Hui En
    Quek, Ethan J. W.
    Loo, Jing Hong
    Yun, Choi-Ying
    Teo, Yao Neng
    Teo, Yao Hao
    Leow, Aloysius S. T.
    Li, Tony Y. W.
    Sharma, Vijay K.
    Tan, Benjamin Y. Q.
    Yeo, Leonard L. L.
    Chong, Yao Feng
    Chan, Mark Y.
    Sia, Ching-Hui
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (08):
  • [28] Risk Determination After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Review of 3 Clinical Risk Prediction Tools
    Scruth, Elizabeth Ann
    Page, Karen
    Cheng, Eugene
    Campbell, Michelle
    Worrall-Carter, Linda
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2012, 26 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [29] Safety of endoscopic procedures after acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review
    Cena, Marek
    Gomez, Javier
    Alyousef, Tareq
    Trohman, Richard G.
    Pierko, Krzysztof
    Agarwal, Rajender
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 19 (05) : 447 - 452
  • [30] The prognostic value of Tei index in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review
    Bennett, Sadie
    Wong, Chun Wai
    Griffiths, Timothy
    Stout, Martin
    Khan, Jamal Nasir
    Duckett, Simon
    Heatlie, Grant
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    ECHO RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (04) : 49 - 58