How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act

被引:7
作者
Patton, Elizabeth W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hall, Kelli Stidhana [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Dalton, Vanessa K. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Inst Hlth Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Vet Affairs Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Program Womens Healthcare Effectiveness Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Contraception; Religion; Affordable Care Act; Policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Supreme Court cases challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate for employer-provided reproductive health care have focused on religiously based opposition to coverage. Little is known about women's perspectives on such reproductive health policies. Study design: Data were drawn from the Women's Health Care Experiences and Preferences survey, a randomly selected, nationally representative sample of 1078 US women aged 18-55 years. We examined associations between religious affiliation and attitudes toward employer-provided insurance coverage of contraception and abortion services as well as the exclusion of religious institutions from this coverage. We used chi-square and multivariable logistic regression for analysis. Results: Respondents self-identified as Baptist (18%), Protestant (Other Mainline, 17%), Catholic (17%), Other Christian (20%), Religious, Non-Christian (7%) or No Affiliation (21%). Religious affiliation was associated with proportions of agreement for contraception (p=.03), abortion (p<.01) and religious exclusion (p<.01) policies. In multivariable models, differences in the odds of agreement varied across religious affiliations and frequency of service attendance. For example, compared to non-affiliated women, Baptists and Other Nondenominational Christians (but not Catholics) had lower odds of agreement with employer coverage of contraception (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.4-0.1 and OR 0.57, CI 0.4-0.9, respectively); women who attended services weekly or more than weekly had lower odds of agreement (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.3-0.8 and OR 0.33, CI 0.2-0.6, respectively), compared to less frequent attenders. Conclusions: Recent religiously motivated legal challenges to employer-provided reproductive health care coverage may not represent the attitudes of many religious women. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 519
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Alexandra S., 2012, NEW DRUG TRIAL SEEKS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, PUBLIC RELIG RES I
  • [3] [Anonymous], N Y TIMES
  • [4] When Religious Freedom Clashes with Access to Care
    Cohen, I. Glenn
    Lynch, Holly Fernandez
    Curfman, Gregory D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (07) : 596 - 599
  • [5] Women's Health and the Affordable Care Act: High Hopes Versus Harsh Realities?
    Hall, Kelli Stidham
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Zochowski, Melissa
    Dalton, Vanessa K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (08) : E10 - E13
  • [6] Jones RK, 2011, COUNTERING CONVENTIO
  • [7] Noncontracepting behavior in women at risk for unintended pregnancy: What's religion got to do with it?
    Kramer, Michael R.
    Hogue, Carol J. Rowland
    Gaydos, Laura M. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (05) : 327 - 334
  • [8] Lugo L., 2008, US Religious Landscape Survey
  • [9] MCCARTHY M, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V347, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.F4915
  • [10] Attitudes About Mandated Coverage of Birth Control Medication and Other Health Benefits in a US National Sample
    Moniz, Michelle H.
    Davis, Matthew M.
    Chang, Tammy
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24): : 2539 - 2541