Negative pressure wound therapy use to decrease surgical nosocomial events in colorectal resections (NEPTUNE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

被引:19
作者
Chadi, Sami A. [1 ]
Vogt, Kelly N. [1 ]
Knowles, Sarah [1 ]
Murphy, Patrick B. [1 ]
Van Koughnett, Julie Ann [1 ]
Brackstone, Muriel [1 ]
Ott, Michael C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, LHSC, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Surg & Surg Oncol, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
关键词
Surgical site infection; Colorectal resection; Negative pressure wound therapy; Prevena (TM); VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; CLOSED INCISION MANAGEMENT; SITE INFECTIONS; CARE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-015-0817-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second most common form of nosocomial infection. Colorectal resections have high rates of SSIs secondary to the inherently contaminated intraluminal environment. Negative pressure wound therapy dressings have been used on primarily closed incisions to reduce surgical site infections in other surgical disciplines. No randomized control trials exist to support the use of negative pressure wound therapy following elective open colorectal resection to reduce surgical site infection. Methods/Design: In this single-center, superiority designed prospective randomized open blinded endpoint controlled trial, patients scheduled for a colorectal resection via a laparotomy will be considered eligible. Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection will be enrolled but only randomized and included if the operation is converted to an open procedure. Exclusion criteria are patients receiving an abdominoperineal resection or a palliative procedure, as well as pregnant patients and those with an adhesive allergy. After informed consent, 300 patients will be randomized to the use of a standard adhesive gauze dressing or to a negative pressure wound device. Patients will be followed in hospital and reassessed on post-operative day 30. The primary outcome measure is SSI within the first 30 post-operative days. Secondary outcomes include the length of hospital stay, the number of return visits related to a potential or actual SSI, cost, and the need for homecare. The primary endpoint analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: NEPTUNE is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in decreasing the rates of surgical site infections in the abdominal incisions of patients following an elective, open colorectal resection. This low-risk intervention may help decrease the morbidity and costs associated with the development of an SSI in our patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Does Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Have a Role in Preventing Poststernotomy Wound Complications?
    Atkins, Broadus Zane
    Wooten, Mary Kay
    Kistler, Jean
    Hurley, Kista
    Hughes, G. Chad
    Wolfe, Walter G.
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2009, 16 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [2] Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Significantly Reduces Surgical Site Infection in Open Colorectal Surgery
    Bonds, Allison M.
    Novick, Tessa K.
    Dietert, Jessica B.
    Araghizadeh, Farshid Y.
    Olson, Craig H.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (12) : 1403 - 1408
  • [3] Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Decreases the Frequency of Postoperative Perineal Surgical Site Infections: A Cohort Study
    Chadi, Sami A.
    Kidane, Biniam
    Britto, Karen
    Brackstone, Muriel
    Ott, Michael C.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 999 - 1006
  • [4] Incisional vacuum-assisted closure therapy
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    Lin, Albert
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2006, 20 (10) : 705 - 709
  • [5] Hansson L, 1992, Blood Press, V1, P113, DOI 10.3109/08037059209077502
  • [6] Evaluation of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): Hematoma/seroma and involvement of the lymphatic system
    Kilpadi, Deepak V.
    Cunningham, Mark R.
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2011, 19 (05) : 588 - 596
  • [7] Continuous follow-up of surgical site infections for 30 days after colorectal surgery
    Kobayashi, Minako
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Inoue, Yasuhiro
    Okita, Yoshiki
    Miki, Chikao
    Kusunoki, Masato
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (06) : 1142 - 1146
  • [8] Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection - Results of prospective surveillance
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    Kishimoto, Junji
    Nagawa, Hirokazu
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (05) : 758 - 763
  • [9] Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group Recommendations
    Lassen, Kristoffer
    Soop, Mattias
    Nygren, Jonas
    Cox, P. Boris W.
    Hendry, Paul O.
    Spies, Claudia
    von Meyenfeldt, Maarten F.
    Fearon, Kenneth C. H.
    Revhaug, Arthur
    Norderval, Stig
    Ljungqvist, Olle
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    Dejong, Cornelis H. C.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (10) : 961 - 969
  • [10] Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999
    Mangram, AJ
    Horan, TC
    Pearson, ML
    Silver, LC
    Jarvis, WR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1999, 27 (02) : 97 - 132