The CareFirst Patient-Centered Medical Home Program: Cost and Utilization Effects in Its First Three Years

被引:24
作者
Cuellar, Alison [1 ]
Helmchen, Lorens A. [2 ]
Gimm, Gilbert [2 ]
Want, Jay [3 ]
Burla, Sriteja [4 ]
Kells, Bradley J. [4 ]
Kicinger, Iwona [4 ]
Nichols, Len M. [4 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Hlth Adm & Policy, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Washington, DC USA
[3] Ctr Improving Value Hlth Care, Denver, CO USA
[4] George Mason Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy Res & Eth, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
patient-centered care; primary care redesign; program evaluation; STRUCTURING PAYMENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS; CARE; QUALITY; INNOVATION; PROVIDERS; SAVINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-016-3814-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Enhanced primary care models have diffused slowly and shown uneven results. Because their structural features are costly and challenging for small practices to implement, they offer modest rewards for improved performance, and improvement takes time. To test whether a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model that significantly rewarded cost savings and accommodated small primary care practices was associated with lower spending, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer emergency room visits. We compared medical care expenditures and utilization among adults who participated in the PCMH program to adults who did not participate. We computed difference-in-difference estimates using two-part multivariate generalized linear models for expenditures and negative binomial models for utilization. Control variables included patient demographics, county, chronic condition indicators, and illness severity. A total of 1,433,297 adults aged 18-64 years, residing in Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, and insured by CareFirst for at least 3 consecutive months between 2010 and 2013. CareFirst implemented enhanced fee-for-service payments to the practices, offered a large retrospective bonus if annual cost and quality targets were exceeded, and provided information and care coordination support. Outcomes were quarterly claims expenditures per member for all covered services, inpatient care, emergency care, and prescription drugs, and quarterly inpatient admissions and emergency room visits. By the third intervention year, annual adjusted total claims payments were $109 per participating member (95 % CI: -$192, -$27), or 2.8 % lower than before the program and compared to those who did not participate. Forty-two percent of the overall decline in spending was explained by lower inpatient care, emergency care, and prescription drug spending. Much of the reduction in inpatient and emergency spending was explained by lower utilization of services. A PCMH model that does not require practices to make infrastructure investments and that rewards cost savings can reduce spending and utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1388
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] RTI International, EV MULT ADV PRIM CAR
  • [32] The 'Alternative Quality Contract,' Based On A Global Budget, Lowered Medical Spending And Improved Quality
    Song, Zirui
    Safran, Dana Gelb
    Landon, Bruce E.
    Landrum, Mary Beth
    He, Yulei
    Mechanic, Robert E.
    Day, Matthew P.
    Chernew, Michael E.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (08) : 1885 - 1894
  • [33] Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change
    Stuart E.A.
    Huskamp H.A.
    Duckworth K.
    Simmons J.
    Song Z.
    Chernew M.E.
    Barry C.L.
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2014, 14 (4) : 166 - 182
  • [34] Taylor Erin., 2015, Mathematica Policy Research
  • [35] The Patient-centered Medical Home An Evaluation of a Single Private Payer Demonstration in New Jersey
    Werner, Rachel M.
    Duggan, Mark
    Duey, Katia
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (06) : 487 - 493