Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion

被引:20
作者
Xu, Q. [1 ]
Wehrle, E. [1 ]
Baier, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Lehrstuhl Leichtbau, Munich, Germany
关键词
design optimization; surrogate modelling; adaptive surrogate based design optimization; expected improvement;
D O I
10.1080/02331934.2011.644286
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A prominent advantage of using surrogate models in structural design optimization is that computational effort can be greatly reduced without significantly compromising model accuracy. The essential goal is to perform the design optimization with fewer evaluations of the typically finite element analysis and ensuring accuracy of the optimization results. An adaptive surrogate based design optimization framework is proposed, in which Latin hypercube sampling and Kriging are used to build surrogate models. Accuracy of the models is improved adaptively using an infill criterion called expected improvement (EI). It is the anticipated improvement that an interpolation point will lead to the current surrogate models. The point that will lead to the maximum EI is searched and used as infill points at each iteration. For constrained optimization problems, the surrogate of constraint is also utilized to form a constrained EI as the corresponding infill criterion. Computational trials on mathematical test functions and on a three-dimensional aircraft wing model are carried out to test the feasibility of this method. Compared with the traditional surrogate base design optimization and direct optimization methods, this method can find the optimum design with fewer evaluations of the original system model and maintain good accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 684
页数:24
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] Lin D.K., 2001, International Journal of Reliability and Application, V2, P209
  • [12] A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE
    MCKAY, MD
    BECKMAN, RJ
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [13] OWEN AB, 1992, STAT SINICA, V2, P439
  • [14] Comparison of Surrogate Models in a Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Wing Design
    Paiva, Ricardo M.
    Carvalho, Andre R. D.
    Crawford, Curran
    Suleman, Afzal
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (05) : 995 - 1006
  • [15] Surrogate-based analysis and optimization
    Queipo, NV
    Haftka, RT
    Shyy, W
    Goel, T
    Vaidyanathan, R
    Tucker, PK
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2005, 41 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [16] Robinson G. K., 1991, STAT SCI, V6, P15, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177011926, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011926]
  • [17] Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion
    Simpson, TW
    Booker, AJ
    Ghosh, D
    Giunta, AA
    Koch, PN
    Yang, RJ
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2004, 27 (05) : 302 - 313
  • [18] A tutorial on support vector regression
    Smola, AJ
    Schölkopf, B
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2004, 14 (03) : 199 - 222
  • [19] Sobester A., 2008, Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide, DOI 10.1002/9780470770801
  • [20] GENERALIZED QUOTA SAMPLING
    STEINBERG, HA
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1963, 15 (02) : 142 - +