Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion

被引:20
作者
Xu, Q. [1 ]
Wehrle, E. [1 ]
Baier, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Lehrstuhl Leichtbau, Munich, Germany
关键词
design optimization; surrogate modelling; adaptive surrogate based design optimization; expected improvement;
D O I
10.1080/02331934.2011.644286
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A prominent advantage of using surrogate models in structural design optimization is that computational effort can be greatly reduced without significantly compromising model accuracy. The essential goal is to perform the design optimization with fewer evaluations of the typically finite element analysis and ensuring accuracy of the optimization results. An adaptive surrogate based design optimization framework is proposed, in which Latin hypercube sampling and Kriging are used to build surrogate models. Accuracy of the models is improved adaptively using an infill criterion called expected improvement (EI). It is the anticipated improvement that an interpolation point will lead to the current surrogate models. The point that will lead to the maximum EI is searched and used as infill points at each iteration. For constrained optimization problems, the surrogate of constraint is also utilized to form a constrained EI as the corresponding infill criterion. Computational trials on mathematical test functions and on a three-dimensional aircraft wing model are carried out to test the feasibility of this method. Compared with the traditional surrogate base design optimization and direct optimization methods, this method can find the optimum design with fewer evaluations of the original system model and maintain good accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 684
页数:24
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Aldrich J, 1997, STAT SCI, V12, P162
  • [2] [Anonymous], P 1 INT C SOFT COMP
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS TU MUNCHEN MU
  • [4] [Anonymous], SSGTECH97027 BOEING
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1998, P 7 AIAA USAF NASA I
  • [6] On polynomial response surfaces and Kriging for use in structural optimization of crashworthiness
    Forsberg, J
    Nilsson, L
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 29 (03) : 232 - 243
  • [7] Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on kriging surrogate models
    Huang, Zhangjun
    Wang, Chengen
    Chen, Jian
    Tian, Hong
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2011, 89 (1-2) : 27 - 37
  • [8] Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review
    Kleijnen, Jack P. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 192 (03) : 707 - 716
  • [9] Design and analysis of computer experiments
    Kuhnt, Sonja
    Steinberg, David M.
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 94 (04) : 307 - 309
  • [10] An accumulative error based adaptive design of experiments for offline metamodeling
    Li, Genzi
    Aute, Vikrant
    Azarm, Shapour
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 40 (1-6) : 137 - 155