Psychometric characteristics of comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) for long-term care facilities and community care: A systematic review

被引:3
作者
Molinari-Ulate, Mauricio [1 ,2 ]
Mahmoudi, Aysan [1 ,2 ]
Franco-Martin, Manuel A. [1 ,3 ]
van der Roest, Henriette G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Inst Biomed Res Salamanca, Psycho Sci Res Grp, Salamanca, Spain
[2] INTRAS Fdn, Iberian Inst Res Psychosci, Dept Res & Dev, Zamora, Spain
[3] Zamora Healthcare Complex, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Dept, Zamora, Spain
[4] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Dept Aging, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Long-term care; Community care; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; CGA; Reliability; Validity; MINIMUM DATA-SET; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; ASSESSMENT INFORMATION SET; DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT; CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT; VALID INSTRUMENT; MDS-HC; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.arr.2022.101742
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) have been incorporated as an integrated care approach effective to face the challenges associated to uncoordinated care, risk of hospitalization, unmet needs, and care planning experienced in older adult care. As they assessed different dimensions, is important to inform about the content and psychometric properties to guide the decisions when selecting and implementing them in practice. This systematic review provides a comprehensive insight on the strengths and weaknesses of the CGAs used in long-term care settings and community care.Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies published up to July 13, 2021, were considered. Quality appraisal was performed for the included studies. Results: A total of 10 different CGAs were identified from 71 studies included. Three instruments were reported for long-term care settings, and seven for community care. The content was not homogenous and differed in terms of the detail and clearness of the areas being evaluated. Evidence for good to excellent validity and reli-ability was reported for various instruments.Conclusions: Setting more specific and clear domains, associated to the special needs of the care setting, could improve informed decisions at the time of selecting and implementing a CGA. Considering the amount and quality of the evidence, the instrument development trajectory, the validation in different languages, and availability in different care settings, we recommend the interRAI LTCF and interRAI HC to be used for long-term facilities and community care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Data Mining Algorithms and Techniques in Mental Health: A Systematic Review [J].
Alonso, Susel Gongora ;
de la Torre-Diez, Isabel ;
Hamrioui, Sofiane ;
Lopez-Coronado, Miguel ;
Calvo Barreno, Diego ;
Moron Nozaleda, Lola ;
Franco, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (09)
[2]   Validity and reliability of the Minimum Data Set Depression Rating Scale (MDSDRS) for older adults in nursing homes [J].
Anderson, RL ;
Buckwalter, KC ;
Buchanan, RJ ;
Maas, ML ;
Imhof, SL .
AGE AND AGEING, 2003, 32 (04) :435-438
[3]  
Beck Anne Marie, 2001, Age and Ageing, V30, P161, DOI 10.1093/ageing/30.2.161
[4]   Second and third generation assessment instruments: The birth of standardization in geriatric care [J].
Bernabei, Roberto ;
Landi, Francesco ;
Onder, Graziano ;
Liperoti, Rosa ;
Garnbassi, Giovanni .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 63 (03) :308-313
[5]   Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities [J].
Björkgren, MA ;
Häkkinen, U ;
Finne-Soveri, UH ;
Fries, BE .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 27 (03) :228-234
[6]  
British Geriatric Society, 2019, Comprehensive geriatric assessment toolkit for primary care practitioners
[7]   A frailty index derived from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts mortality and aged residential care admission [J].
Burn, Rosie ;
Hubbard, Ruth E. ;
Scrase, Richard J. ;
Abey-Nesbit, Rebecca K. ;
Peel, Nancye M. ;
Schluter, Philip J. ;
Jamieson, Hamish A. .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2018, 18
[8]   Validation of the Minimum Data Set in Identifying Hospitalization Events and Payment Source [J].
Cai, Shubing ;
Mukamel, Dana B. ;
Veazie, Peter ;
Temkin-Greener, Helena .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 12 (01) :38-43
[9]   The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: a comparison of different measures [J].
Campitelli, Michael A. ;
Bronskill, Susan E. ;
Hogan, David B. ;
Diong, Christina ;
Amuah, Joseph E. ;
Gill, Sudeep ;
Seitz, Dallas ;
Thavorn, Kednapa ;
Wodchis, Walter P. ;
Maxwell, Colleen J. .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2016, 16
[10]   'Single' Assessment for Older People: Comparison of the MDS-HC with Current Auditable Methods in the Home Care Setting [J].
Carpenter, G. Iain ;
Challis, David J. ;
Swift, Cameron .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2005, 13 (05) :35-41