Effects of the Soil Moisture Content on the Superoxide Anion and Proline Contents in Soybean Leaves

被引:5
作者
Wu, Zihao [1 ]
Wang, Xiyue [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
Ma, Chunmei [1 ]
Liu, Lijun [1 ]
Dong, Shoukun [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Agr Univ, Harbin 150036, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Drought; Proline; Soybean; Soil moisture content; Superoxide anion;
D O I
10.18805/LR-626
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Background: As an important source of feed protein, soybean is involved in the processing industry, food industry and other fields. Therefore, in recent years, the demand for soybean has increased and soybean planting areas have also increased. However, frequent droughts have a serious impact on soybean yield. Methods: During the flowering period, the soybean plants were subjected to drought treatments of different degrees (0-7 days without water). The superoxide anion and proline contents in the leaves were determined. Then, fitting curves were drawn between the soil moisture content and the superoxide anion and proline contents. Result: The effects of different soil moisture contents on the superoxide anion and proline contents in soybean leaves and the correlation between these contents were analyzed. According to the fitting curves, with a decrease in the volumetric water content of soil, the superoxide anion and proline contents in soybean leaves increased. The superoxide anion contents in drought-tolerant cultivars were significantly lower than those in drought-sensitive cultivars and the proline contents were significantly higher in drought-tolerant cultivars than those in drought-sensitive cultivars. The superoxide anion content in soybean leaves was positively correlated with the proline content in the soil volumetric water content range of 31.5% to 14.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 318
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Cai Kun-Zheng, 2008, Zhiwu Shengtai Xuebao, V32, P491, DOI 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.029
[2]  
Chen J., 2013, J ANHUI AGR SCI, V41, P10577
[3]  
Gao Y., 2007, J HEILONGJIANG BAYI, V04, P13
[4]  
Lestari M. W., 2019, Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, V53, P223, DOI 10.18805/IJARe.A-369
[5]   不同嫁接方式下大豆对干旱胁迫的响应 [J].
李盛有 ;
孙旭刚 ;
王昌陵 ;
曹永强 ;
王文斌 ;
宋书宏 .
中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42 (04) :632-639
[6]   水分胁迫对春大豆出苗和幼苗长势的影响 [J].
李秀芬 ;
马树庆 ;
李云峰 ;
于海 ;
徐丽萍 ;
陈凤涛 ;
张洪伟 ;
翟墨 .
生态学杂志, 2020, 39 (08) :2602-2609
[7]  
Liu Jie Liu Jie, 2017, Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, V44, P316
[8]  
[莫红 MO Hong], 2007, [湖北农业科学, Hubei agricultural sciences], V46, P45
[9]  
Padmavathi T. A. V., 2014, Trends in Biosciences, V7, P3802
[10]  
Peng J, 2011, SCI TECHNOLOGICAL IN, V32, P262