Ethical Rationing of Personal Protective Equipment to Minimize Moral Residue During the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:33
作者
Binkley, Charles E. [1 ]
Kemp, David S. [2 ]
机构
[1] ProNobis Hlth, 584 Castro St,207, San Francisco, CA 94114 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Law, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.031
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This article proposes systems for the fair distribution of scarce resources to healthcare providers. It builds on classic ethical structures and adapts them to the equitable distribution of personal protective equipment (PPE) to clinicians at risk of contracting novel corona virus-19 (COVID-19). The article also defines systems of allocation that are generally considered unethical and are to be avoided. We emphasize that policies must be transparent, collaborative, applied equally, and have a system of accountability. It is recognized that unless the supply of PPE is quickly replenished, or viable alternatives to traditional equipment are devised in the coming days to weeks, hospitals and healthcare systems will face the difficult task of rationing PPE to at-risk clinicians. This paper suggests an ethical framework for that process. ((C)2020 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1113
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007, ETH GUID PAND INFL
  • [2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, ETH CONS DEC MAK REG
  • [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, STRAT OPT SUPPL N95
  • [4] Clarifying the Language of Clinician Distress
    Dean, Wendy
    Talbot, Simon G.
    Caplan, Arthur
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (10): : 923 - 924
  • [5] Padilla M, 2020, NY TIMES
  • [6] Reuters, 2020, Reuters